Trader consensus leans heavily against Pakistan military action targeting Kabul by March 31, driven by the absence of official threats, troop mobilizations, or escalatory rhetoric from Islamabad aimed at the Afghan capital. Recent cross-border airstrikes by Pakistan have focused on TTP militant hideouts in eastern provinces like Khost and Paktia, sparing Kabul and framing operations as counterterrorism rather than state-on-state conflict. Kabul's Taliban leadership has condemned the strikes and vowed retaliation but emphasized dialogue amid mutual ambassador expulsions. No primary announcements signal plans for capital assault, with diplomatic channels and economic interdependence favoring restraint over improbable escalation before the deadline.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jourPakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
Pakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Marché ouvert : Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus leans heavily against Pakistan military action targeting Kabul by March 31, driven by the absence of official threats, troop mobilizations, or escalatory rhetoric from Islamabad aimed at the Afghan capital. Recent cross-border airstrikes by Pakistan have focused on TTP militant hideouts in eastern provinces like Khost and Paktia, sparing Kabul and framing operations as counterterrorism rather than state-on-state conflict. Kabul's Taliban leadership has condemned the strikes and vowed retaliation but emphasized dialogue amid mutual ambassador expulsions. No primary announcements signal plans for capital assault, with diplomatic channels and economic interdependence favoring restraint over improbable escalation before the deadline.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes