Traders' 73% implied probability on "No" for Pakistani military action against Kabul by March 31 reflects the absence of official announcements or credible intelligence signaling such an escalation, distinguishing it from prior limited airstrikes in Afghan border provinces like Khost and Paktika targeting TTP militants. Recent diplomatic channels, including Taliban pledges to curb cross-border militancy and Pakistan's focus on intelligence-sharing via trilateral talks with China and Iran, have de-escalated rhetoric without evidence of Kabul-specific preparations. Ongoing TTP attacks sustain tensions, but historical patterns favor restrained responses over capital strikes, with no reported troop buildups amid Afghanistan's fragile internal stability.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約 · 更新日For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
マーケット開始日: Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Traders' 73% implied probability on "No" for Pakistani military action against Kabul by March 31 reflects the absence of official announcements or credible intelligence signaling such an escalation, distinguishing it from prior limited airstrikes in Afghan border provinces like Khost and Paktika targeting TTP militants. Recent diplomatic channels, including Taliban pledges to curb cross-border militancy and Pakistan's focus on intelligence-sharing via trilateral talks with China and Iran, have de-escalated rhetoric without evidence of Kabul-specific preparations. Ongoing TTP attacks sustain tensions, but historical patterns favor restrained responses over capital strikes, with no reported troop buildups amid Afghanistan's fragile internal stability.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問