Trader consensus favors no Pakistani military action against Kabul by March 31 at 72%, driven by Islamabad's consistent restraint in limiting responses to cross-border strikes on TTP militant hideouts in Afghanistan's peripheral provinces like Khost and Paktika, rather than the capital. Recent developments, including artillery exchanges along the Durand Line on March 20-25 after Taliban attacks on Pakistani posts, prompted diplomatic protests but no escalation signals from Pakistan's ISPR. Official statements emphasize targeting militants, not Kabul, amid ongoing talks and mutual accusations over harboring groups. With no verified threats or troop buildups reported, markets reflect low risk of broader conflict before the deadline.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · AtualizadoPakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
Pakistan military action against Kabul by March 31?
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Mercado Aberto: Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus favors no Pakistani military action against Kabul by March 31 at 72%, driven by Islamabad's consistent restraint in limiting responses to cross-border strikes on TTP militant hideouts in Afghanistan's peripheral provinces like Khost and Paktika, rather than the capital. Recent developments, including artillery exchanges along the Durand Line on March 20-25 after Taliban attacks on Pakistani posts, prompted diplomatic protests but no escalation signals from Pakistan's ISPR. Official statements emphasize targeting militants, not Kabul, amid ongoing talks and mutual accusations over harboring groups. With no verified threats or troop buildups reported, markets reflect low risk of broader conflict before the deadline.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions