Skip to main content
icon for SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?

SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?

icon for SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?

SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?

Sim

82%
Polymarket
NOVO

Sim

82%
Polymarket
NOVO
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.**SCOTUS granting certiorari on June 30, 2026, to challenges against assault-weapons bans in Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, has placed the question of whether the Second Amendment protects AR-15-style semiautomatic rifles squarely before the Court for the first time.** The consolidated cases will be argued in the fall term, with a decision likely by mid-2027, creating a closely divided trader consensus at 50% for invalidation. A 6-3 conservative majority has repeatedly expanded gun rights under the Bruen historical-tradition test, yet lower courts have upheld many bans by classifying these firearms as unusually dangerous rather than in common use for self-defense. Recent signals from Justices Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch highlight skepticism toward the restrictions, while concerns over mass-shooting risks and state regulatory authority introduce countervailing uncertainty. Oral arguments, amicus filings, and evolving views on “common use” will likely determine the outcome and set precedent for similar laws nationwide.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No".

This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.

The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Volume
$4
Data de Término
1 ago 2027
Mercado Aberto
Jul 1, 2026, 4:56 PM ET
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.**SCOTUS granting certiorari on June 30, 2026, to challenges against assault-weapons bans in Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, has placed the question of whether the Second Amendment protects AR-15-style semiautomatic rifles squarely before the Court for the first time.** The consolidated cases will be argued in the fall term, with a decision likely by mid-2027, creating a closely divided trader consensus at 50% for invalidation. A 6-3 conservative majority has repeatedly expanded gun rights under the Bruen historical-tradition test, yet lower courts have upheld many bans by classifying these firearms as unusually dangerous rather than in common use for self-defense. Recent signals from Justices Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch highlight skepticism toward the restrictions, while concerns over mass-shooting risks and state regulatory authority introduce countervailing uncertainty. Oral arguments, amicus filings, and evolving views on “common use” will likely determine the outcome and set precedent for similar laws nationwide.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No".

This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.

The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Volume
$4
Data de Término
1 ago 2027
Mercado Aberto
Jul 1, 2026, 4:56 PM ET
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.

Cuidado com os links externos.

Frequently Asked Questions

"SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?" is a prediction market on Polymarket with 2 possible outcomes where traders buy and sell shares based on what they believe will happen. The current leading outcome is "SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?" at 72%. Prices reflect real-time crowd-sourced probabilities. For example, a share priced at 72¢ implies that the market collectively assigns a 72% chance to that outcome. These odds shift continuously as traders react to new developments and information. Shares in the correct outcome are redeemable for $1 each upon market resolution.

"SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?" is a newly created market on Polymarket, launched on Jul 1, 2026. As an early market, this is your opportunity to be among the first traders to set the odds and establish the market's initial price signals. You can also bookmark this page to track volume and trading activity as the market gains traction over time.

To trade on "SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?," browse the 2 available outcomes listed on this page. Each outcome displays a current price representing the market's implied probability. To take a position, select the outcome you believe is most likely, choose "Yes" to trade in favor of it or "No" to trade against it, enter your amount, and click "Trade." If your chosen outcome is correct when the market resolves, your "Yes" shares pay out $1 each. If it's incorrect, they pay out $0. You can also sell your shares at any time before resolution if you want to lock in a profit or cut a loss.

The current frontrunner for "SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?" is "SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?" at 72%, meaning the market assigns a 72% chance to that outcome. These odds update in real-time as traders buy and sell shares, so they reflect the latest collective view of what's most likely to happen. Check back frequently or bookmark this page to follow how the odds shift as new information emerges.

The resolution rules for "SCOTUS invalida proibições de AR-15?" define exactly what needs to happen for each outcome to be declared a winner — including the official data sources used to determine the result. You can review the complete resolution criteria in the "Rules" section on this page above the comments. We recommend reading the rules carefully before trading, as they specify the precise conditions, edge cases, and sources that govern how this market is settled.