With the April 30 deadline passed, trader consensus at 99.7% "No" reflects Congress's repeated failure to advance an Iran War Powers Resolution, culminating in the Senate's sixth rejection on April 30 by a 50-47 vote along largely partisan lines. Democrats pushed multiple concurrent resolutions—such as H.Con.Res.91 and S.J.Res.104—invoking section 5(c) of the 1973 War Powers Resolution to mandate withdrawal from unauthorized hostilities against Iran amid the 60-day clock on U.S. operations, but Republican majorities blocked discharge motions and floor votes, even as Sen. Susan Collins crossed party lines once. House attempts similarly faltered, like a 213-214 defeat. Realistic shifts now hinge on improbable emergency sessions or veto overrides, unlikely given historical patterns and slim Democratic margins.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · AktualisiertJa
$22,533 Vol.
$22,533 Vol.
Ja
$22,533 Vol.
$22,533 Vol.
Legislation will qualify as seeking to limit U.S. armed forces military action in the recent US/Israel–Iran conflict if it explicitly seeks to restrict, terminate, or require congressional approval for U.S. armed forces’ hostilities, strikes, deployments, or other military operations against Iran or its proxy forces. Non-binding statements or measures that express disapproval, call for investigation, or otherwise relate to the US/Israel-Iran conflict without seeking to limit military action will not qualify.
A measure amended by either chamber will only qualify if the amended version is subsequently finally passed by both chambers in identical form.
The resolution sources will be official congressional voting records and a consensus of credible reporting.
Markt eröffnet: Mar 24, 2026, 4:53 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Nein
Kein Einspruch
Endgültiges Ergebnis: Nein
Legislation will qualify as seeking to limit U.S. armed forces military action in the recent US/Israel–Iran conflict if it explicitly seeks to restrict, terminate, or require congressional approval for U.S. armed forces’ hostilities, strikes, deployments, or other military operations against Iran or its proxy forces. Non-binding statements or measures that express disapproval, call for investigation, or otherwise relate to the US/Israel-Iran conflict without seeking to limit military action will not qualify.
A measure amended by either chamber will only qualify if the amended version is subsequently finally passed by both chambers in identical form.
The resolution sources will be official congressional voting records and a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Vorgeschlagenes Ergebnis: Nein
Kein Einspruch
Endgültiges Ergebnis: Nein
With the April 30 deadline passed, trader consensus at 99.7% "No" reflects Congress's repeated failure to advance an Iran War Powers Resolution, culminating in the Senate's sixth rejection on April 30 by a 50-47 vote along largely partisan lines. Democrats pushed multiple concurrent resolutions—such as H.Con.Res.91 and S.J.Res.104—invoking section 5(c) of the 1973 War Powers Resolution to mandate withdrawal from unauthorized hostilities against Iran amid the 60-day clock on U.S. operations, but Republican majorities blocked discharge motions and floor votes, even as Sen. Susan Collins crossed party lines once. House attempts similarly faltered, like a 213-214 defeat. Realistic shifts now hinge on improbable emergency sessions or veto overrides, unlikely given historical patterns and slim Democratic margins.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert



Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen