Skip to main content
icon for SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ?

SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ?

icon for SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ?

SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ?

Oui

82% chance
Polymarket
NOUVEAU

Oui

82% chance
Polymarket
NOUVEAU
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.**SCOTUS granting certiorari on June 30, 2026, to challenges against assault-weapons bans in Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, has placed the question of whether the Second Amendment protects AR-15-style semiautomatic rifles squarely before the Court for the first time.** The consolidated cases will be argued in the fall term, with a decision likely by mid-2027, creating a closely divided trader consensus at 50% for invalidation. A 6-3 conservative majority has repeatedly expanded gun rights under the Bruen historical-tradition test, yet lower courts have upheld many bans by classifying these firearms as unusually dangerous rather than in common use for self-defense. Recent signals from Justices Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch highlight skepticism toward the restrictions, while concerns over mass-shooting risks and state regulatory authority introduce countervailing uncertainty. Oral arguments, amicus filings, and evolving views on “common use” will likely determine the outcome and set precedent for similar laws nationwide.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No".

This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.

The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Volume
$4
Date de fin
1 août 2027
Marché ouvert
Jul 1, 2026, 4:56 PM ET
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.**SCOTUS granting certiorari on June 30, 2026, to challenges against assault-weapons bans in Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, has placed the question of whether the Second Amendment protects AR-15-style semiautomatic rifles squarely before the Court for the first time.** The consolidated cases will be argued in the fall term, with a decision likely by mid-2027, creating a closely divided trader consensus at 50% for invalidation. A 6-3 conservative majority has repeatedly expanded gun rights under the Bruen historical-tradition test, yet lower courts have upheld many bans by classifying these firearms as unusually dangerous rather than in common use for self-defense. Recent signals from Justices Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch highlight skepticism toward the restrictions, while concerns over mass-shooting risks and state regulatory authority introduce countervailing uncertainty. Oral arguments, amicus filings, and evolving views on “common use” will likely determine the outcome and set precedent for similar laws nationwide.

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No".

This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution.

The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Volume
$4
Date de fin
1 août 2027
Marché ouvert
Jul 1, 2026, 4:56 PM ET
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the United States Supreme Court, in either or both of Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, issues a ruling or order with the effect of invalidating state or local bans on the ownership or possession of AR-15 or similar semiautomatic rifles, by August 1, 2027, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. If both of the referenced cases are permanently removed from the court's docket without the issuance of such a ruling or order, this market will immediately resolve to "No". This market will resolve based on the Supreme Court’s decision in these cases. Other related cases or legislation will not affect resolution. The resolution source for this market will be official information from the U.S. Supreme Court; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.

Méfiez-vous des liens externes.

Questions fréquentes

« SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ? » est un marché de prédiction sur Polymarket avec 2 résultats possibles où les traders achètent et vendent des parts selon ce qu'ils pensent qu'il se passera. Le résultat en tête actuel est « La Cour suprême invalide-t-elle les interdictions des AR-15 ? » à 67%. Les prix reflètent des probabilités en temps réel de la communauté. Par exemple, une part cotée à 67¢ implique que le marché attribue collectivement une probabilité de 67% à ce résultat. Ces cotes changent en permanence. Les parts du résultat correct sont échangeables contre $1 chacune lors de la résolution du marché.

« SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ? » est un marché nouvellement créé sur Polymarket, lancé le Jul 1, 2026. En tant que marché récent, c'est votre opportunité d'être parmi les premiers traders à définir les cotes et établir les premiers signaux de prix du marché. Vous pouvez également ajouter cette page à vos favoris pour suivre le volume et l'activité de trading au fil du temps.

Pour trader sur « SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ? », parcourez les 2 résultats disponibles sur cette page. Chaque résultat affiche un prix actuel représentant la probabilité implicite du marché. Pour prendre position, sélectionnez le résultat que vous estimez le plus probable, choisissez « Oui » pour trader en sa faveur ou « Non » pour trader contre, entrez votre montant et cliquez sur « Trader ». Si votre résultat choisi est correct lors de la résolution, vos parts « Oui » rapportent $1 chacune. S'il est incorrect, elles rapportent $0. Vous pouvez également vendre vos parts avant la résolution.

Le favori actuel pour « SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ? » est « La Cour suprême invalide-t-elle les interdictions des AR-15 ? » à 67%, ce qui signifie que le marché attribue une probabilité de 67% à ce résultat. Ces cotes sont mises à jour en temps réel à mesure que les traders achètent et vendent des parts. Revenez fréquemment ou ajoutez cette page à vos favoris.

Les règles de résolution de « SCOTUS invalide les interdictions AR-15 ? » définissent exactement ce qui doit se produire pour que chaque résultat soit déclaré gagnant, y compris les sources de données officielles utilisées pour déterminer le résultat. Vous pouvez consulter les critères de résolution complets dans la section « Règles » sur cette page au-dessus des commentaires. Nous recommandons de lire attentivement les règles avant de trader, car elles précisent les conditions exactes, les cas particuliers et les sources.