Trader sentiment for the March 27 All-In Podcast market tilts heavily toward politics and AI regulation, with implied probabilities favoring mentions of David Sacks' reported advisory role in a potential Trump administration and escalating U.S.-China tech tensions, per the hosts' recent X posts and Chamath Palihapitiya's comments on venture funding pullbacks. Recent developments include Sacks' high-profile Trump endorsement and Friedberg's critiques of federal spending bills, amplifying expectations for partisan takes amid the 2024 election cycle. Competitive podcast dynamics play a minor role, as All-In's insider access to Silicon Valley execs ensures outsized influence; traders should watch pre-episode teases on X for last-minute shifts, with resolution hinging on verbatim phrasing during the live episode.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約 · 更新日AI / Artificial Intelligence 20+ times
50%
Data Center 8+ times
41%
Anthropic
65%
Dario / Amodei
46%
Sam / Altman
60%
Department of War
43%
Seminar
42%
Nvidia
73%
Tesla
44%
Palantir
46%
Iran
90%
Regulation
66%
Safety
44%
Alignment
45%
New York
43%
California
45%
Silicon Valley
45%
Best Friend
43%
China
52%
Trump
93%
OpenAI
57%
$1,764 Vol.
AI / Artificial Intelligence 20+ times
50%
Data Center 8+ times
41%
Anthropic
65%
Dario / Amodei
46%
Sam / Altman
60%
Department of War
43%
Seminar
42%
Nvidia
73%
Tesla
44%
Palantir
46%
Iran
90%
Regulation
66%
Safety
44%
Alignment
45%
New York
43%
California
45%
Silicon Valley
45%
Best Friend
43%
China
52%
Trump
93%
OpenAI
57%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed term is mentioned by anyone during the next released episode of the All-In Podcast. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No".
If clips of old episodes or prerecorded clips are aired where people are speaking, those clips will count toward this market's resolution.
AI-generated audio or video will count toward this market's resolution.
Any usage of the term, regardless of context, will count toward the resolution of this market.
Plural and possessive forms of the listed term will count toward the resolution of this market regardless of context; however, other forms will NOT count.
Instances where the term is used in a compound word will count regardless of context (e.g. joyful is not a compound word for "joy," however "killjoy" is a compounding of the words "kill" and "joy").
If this market requires a specified number of mentions of a person’s first or last name, a full-name mention will count as one mention (e.g., if a market is about “Joe / Biden 5+ times,” a mention of “Joe Biden” will count once).
This market will resolve according to the next episode of the All-In Podcast added to the official YouTube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5MTSAqaf8peDZQ57QkJBzewJU1aUokl. Specials or other videos posted on the YouTube channel but not included on the All-In Podcast playlist will not be considered.
If no such episode of the All-In Podcast is aired by April 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No".
The resolution source will be audio of the event.
マーケット開始日: Mar 23, 2026, 12:38 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader sentiment for the March 27 All-In Podcast market tilts heavily toward politics and AI regulation, with implied probabilities favoring mentions of David Sacks' reported advisory role in a potential Trump administration and escalating U.S.-China tech tensions, per the hosts' recent X posts and Chamath Palihapitiya's comments on venture funding pullbacks. Recent developments include Sacks' high-profile Trump endorsement and Friedberg's critiques of federal spending bills, amplifying expectations for partisan takes amid the 2024 election cycle. Competitive podcast dynamics play a minor role, as All-In's insider access to Silicon Valley execs ensures outsized influence; traders should watch pre-episode teases on X for last-minute shifts, with resolution hinging on verbatim phrasing during the live episode.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問