In the late-season clash between lottery contenders, the injury-ravaged Indiana Pacers (17-58 entering) swept the Chicago Bulls (29-46) 4-0 with a 145-126 blowout on April 1 at United Center, setting season highs in points and assists despite nine players on the report—including out T.J. McConnell (hamstring), Andrew Nembhard, Jarace Walker, and Aaron Nesmith (various), with Pascal Siakam questionable but delivering 25 points. Bulls, riding a four-game skid and without Zach Collins (toe surgery) and Noa Essengue (shoulder), plus questionable Nick Richards (elbow) and Josh Giddey (hamstring), couldn't overcome Pacers' head-to-head dominance. Both prioritize draft positioning with few games left.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedAll Sports
MLB
UFC
All
Club Friendlies
Chinese Super League
K League 1
MLS
K League 2
Bolivian Primera División
Allsvenskan
Eliteserien
Liga MX
Veikkausliiga
Brasileirão Série B
Brasileirão Série A
Superettan
Ukrainian Premier League
Ekstraklasa
South Africa Premiership
Categoría Primera A
Portugal Super Cup
UCL
Liga de Primera
Chance Liga
LigaPro Serie A
Uruguayan Primera División
USL Championship
Scottish Premiership
UEL
NWSL
Liga 1
Danish Superliga
Copa do Brasil
Kazakhstan Premier League
Liga FPD
Austria Bundesliga
Besta deild karla
efbet Liga
SuperLiga
Swiss Super League
Primera Nacional
Virslīga
Copa Sudamericana
Niké liga
Slovenia PrvaLiga
Prva Liga
Serbian SuperLiga
League of Ireland Premier Division
USL League One
Liga Nacional de Guatemala
OBOS-ligaen
Categoría Primera B
Eredivisie
UEFA Conference League
NB I
Copa Libertadores
Women's Champions League
Premium Liiga
Primeira Liga
Uzbekistan Super League
Australia Cup
TFF Süper Kupa
2. Bundesliga
Saudi Pro League
J2 League
Leagues Cup
National League
Ligue 2
Premier League
LaLiga
Bundesliga
Ligue 1
Serie A
Liga Profesional de Fútbol
EFL CUP
EFL Championship
Coppa Italia
Scottish Cup
Venezuelan Primera División
J1 League
LaLiga2
Hockey
Volleyball
Cycling
Poker
Chess
Pickleball
Esports
Pacers – Bulls
Moneyline
$2.0M Vol.
Spreads
$1.6M Vol.
Totals
$469K Vol.
If the Pacers win, the market will resolve to "Pacers".
If the Bulls win, the market will resolve to "Bulls".
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.
Market Opened: Mar 26, 2026, 10:00 AM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.nba.com/Resolver
0x65070BE91...Pacers – Bulls
Moneyline
$2.0M Vol.
Spreads
$1.6M Vol.
Totals
$469K Vol.
If the Pacers win, the market will resolve to "Pacers".
If the Bulls win, the market will resolve to "Bulls".
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.
Market Opened: Mar 26, 2026, 10:00 AM ET
Resolution Source
https://www.nba.com/Resolver
0x65070BE91...In the late-season clash between lottery contenders, the injury-ravaged Indiana Pacers (17-58 entering) swept the Chicago Bulls (29-46) 4-0 with a 145-126 blowout on April 1 at United Center, setting season highs in points and assists despite nine players on the report—including out T.J. McConnell (hamstring), Andrew Nembhard, Jarace Walker, and Aaron Nesmith (various), with Pascal Siakam questionable but delivering 25 points. Bulls, riding a four-game skid and without Zach Collins (toe surgery) and Noa Essengue (shoulder), plus questionable Nick Richards (elbow) and Josh Giddey (hamstring), couldn't overcome Pacers' head-to-head dominance. Both prioritize draft positioning with few games left.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedBeware of external links.
Beware of external links.


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions