Trader consensus favors "No" at 59.5% implied probability for Pakistani military action against Kabul by March 31, driven by the absence of official threats or troop mobilizations targeting Afghanistan's capital amid ongoing border tensions. Recent Pakistani airstrikes have focused on TTP militant hideouts in eastern provinces like Khost and Paktika, prompting Taliban condemnations but no direct Kabul reprisals. Diplomatic channels remain active, including Pakistani military chief visits to Kabul and trilateral talks with China, signaling de-escalation efforts. Historical patterns show Pakistan avoids strikes on urban centers, prioritizing peripheral targets, while international pressure curbs broader escalation—factors tempering Yes bets despite persistent Durand Line skirmishes.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
市場開放時間: Mar 17, 2026, 8:11 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "military action" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by Pakistani military forces that impact within one of the 22 municipal districts of Kabul.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land within the municipality of Kabul or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, FPV or ground based ATGM strikes directly, ground incursions, naval shelling, cyberattacks, or other operations conducted by Pakistani ground operatives will not qualify.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
If the date/time of a strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by the end of the third calendar date after this market's end date, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus favors "No" at 59.5% implied probability for Pakistani military action against Kabul by March 31, driven by the absence of official threats or troop mobilizations targeting Afghanistan's capital amid ongoing border tensions. Recent Pakistani airstrikes have focused on TTP militant hideouts in eastern provinces like Khost and Paktika, prompting Taliban condemnations but no direct Kabul reprisals. Diplomatic channels remain active, including Pakistani military chief visits to Kabul and trilateral talks with China, signaling de-escalation efforts. Historical patterns show Pakistan avoids strikes on urban centers, prioritizing peripheral targets, while international pressure curbs broader escalation—factors tempering Yes bets despite persistent Durand Line skirmishes.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions