OpenAI’s September 8 announcement of an AI-generated proof establishing statements C and D of the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem, complete with a publicly verifiable Lean formalization, has anchored trader sentiment against retraction. The company deployed thousands of agents over 88 hours on an internal model exceeding GPT-6 Astra capabilities, then spent additional compute confirming the result, while explicitly declining the Millennium Prize. Emerging questions around priority with concurrent human-AI work by mathematicians at NYU and Anthropic, plus data-use concerns, have sparked debate but center on credit and methodology rather than outright invalidity. With independent verification now possible and no demonstrated errors in the core construction, the 87% “No” odds reflect consensus that the published artifact will stand through 2026 absent major new contradictions.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoSí
Sí
OpenAI's Navier-Stokes solution refers to the Navier-Stokes solution that OpenAI announced on September 8, 2026 (https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/).
A qualifying retraction occurs when OpenAI officially and publicly states that the published proof was incorrect or does not solve the Navier-Stokes problem. Statements by any other party will not qualify. Revisions that do not retract the correctness of the initial proof as a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem will not qualify. Statements about the authorship, credit, or attribution of the result, or about whether it qualifies for the Millennium Prize, will not on their own qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from OpenAI; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado abierto: Sep 9, 2026, 6:04 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...OpenAI's Navier-Stokes solution refers to the Navier-Stokes solution that OpenAI announced on September 8, 2026 (https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/).
A qualifying retraction occurs when OpenAI officially and publicly states that the published proof was incorrect or does not solve the Navier-Stokes problem. Statements by any other party will not qualify. Revisions that do not retract the correctness of the initial proof as a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem will not qualify. Statements about the authorship, credit, or attribution of the result, or about whether it qualifies for the Millennium Prize, will not on their own qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from OpenAI; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...OpenAI’s September 8 announcement of an AI-generated proof establishing statements C and D of the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem, complete with a publicly verifiable Lean formalization, has anchored trader sentiment against retraction. The company deployed thousands of agents over 88 hours on an internal model exceeding GPT-6 Astra capabilities, then spent additional compute confirming the result, while explicitly declining the Millennium Prize. Emerging questions around priority with concurrent human-AI work by mathematicians at NYU and Anthropic, plus data-use concerns, have sparked debate but center on credit and methodology rather than outright invalidity. With independent verification now possible and no demonstrated errors in the core construction, the 87% “No” odds reflect consensus that the published artifact will stand through 2026 absent major new contradictions.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado

Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes