Multiple open-seat gubernatorial contests in politically divided states, including Georgia (Bottoms vs. Jackson), Ohio (Acton vs. Ramaswamy), Iowa (Sand vs. Lahn), and Nevada, feature recent primary resolutions and polling averages showing narrow leads or ties that keep projected victory margins tight. Midterm turnout patterns, candidate fundraising, and state-specific factors such as ranked-choice voting in Alaska further compress expected spreads across several races. Trader consensus assigns the highest probabilities to these contests because no single matchup has yet produced a decisive polling separation or structural advantage. Late-cycle developments including economic data releases, candidate debates, or shifts in national approval trends could widen margins in one or more of these states and consolidate market pricing.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · AtualizadoGeorgia 15.7%
Ohio 13.2%
Alaska 12.8%
Texas 11.8%
$14,921 Vol.
$14,921 Vol.
Georgia
16%
Ohio
13%
Alaska
13%
Texas
19%
Iowa
11%
Nevada
9%
Flórida
8%
Kansas
6%
Colorado
4%
Michigan
4%
Wisconsin
4%
New Mexico
3%
Arizona
3%
Oregon
2%
Vermont
2%
New Hampshire
2%
Maine
1%
Minnesota
8%
Georgia 15.7%
Ohio 13.2%
Alaska 12.8%
Texas 11.8%
$14,921 Vol.
$14,921 Vol.
Georgia
16%
Ohio
13%
Alaska
13%
Texas
19%
Iowa
11%
Nevada
9%
Flórida
8%
Kansas
6%
Colorado
4%
Michigan
4%
Wisconsin
4%
New Mexico
3%
Arizona
3%
Oregon
2%
Vermont
2%
New Hampshire
2%
Maine
1%
Minnesota
8%
This market will resolve according to the US gubernatorial race which has the smallest margin of victory.
For the purpose of this market, the “margin of victory” is defined as the absolute difference between the percentages of valid votes received by the first- and second-place candidates. Percentages of the valid votes received by each candidate will be determined by dividing the total number of valid votes each of the top two candidates receives by the sum of all valid votes cast in the election.
For elections that include runoffs, ranked-choice, or other multi-round elections, the relevant margin of victory will be that of the round in which the winner is determined.
If two state margins of victory are identical, this market will resolve to the tied state whose last name comes first alphabetically.
This market will consider the results of all listed gubernatorial elections, including special elections, that are scheduled to be held in November, 2026, by October 31, 2026, including the results of runoff elections held after November, 2026.
The resolution source for this market will be a compilation of all of the relevant state election authorities responsible for certifying statewide elections, however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercado Aberto: Jun 29, 2026, 4:01 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the US gubernatorial race which has the smallest margin of victory.
For the purpose of this market, the “margin of victory” is defined as the absolute difference between the percentages of valid votes received by the first- and second-place candidates. Percentages of the valid votes received by each candidate will be determined by dividing the total number of valid votes each of the top two candidates receives by the sum of all valid votes cast in the election.
For elections that include runoffs, ranked-choice, or other multi-round elections, the relevant margin of victory will be that of the round in which the winner is determined.
If two state margins of victory are identical, this market will resolve to the tied state whose last name comes first alphabetically.
This market will consider the results of all listed gubernatorial elections, including special elections, that are scheduled to be held in November, 2026, by October 31, 2026, including the results of runoff elections held after November, 2026.
The resolution source for this market will be a compilation of all of the relevant state election authorities responsible for certifying statewide elections, however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Multiple open-seat gubernatorial contests in politically divided states, including Georgia (Bottoms vs. Jackson), Ohio (Acton vs. Ramaswamy), Iowa (Sand vs. Lahn), and Nevada, feature recent primary resolutions and polling averages showing narrow leads or ties that keep projected victory margins tight. Midterm turnout patterns, candidate fundraising, and state-specific factors such as ranked-choice voting in Alaska further compress expected spreads across several races. Trader consensus assigns the highest probabilities to these contests because no single matchup has yet produced a decisive polling separation or structural advantage. Late-cycle developments including economic data releases, candidate debates, or shifts in national approval trends could widen margins in one or more of these states and consolidate market pricing.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado


Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions