Recent disclosures of the Pentagon quietly accelerating contingency planning for potential military operations in Cuba, as reported April 15, have intensified US-Cuba tensions, driving trader focus on escalation risks. President Trump's April 13 remark hinting at action post-Iran conflict, coupled with Cuban President Díaz-Canel's April 16 vow to repel invasion on the Bay of Pigs anniversary, signals heightened rhetoric amid Havana's energy crisis from the US oil blockade following January's Maduro capture in Venezuela. US officials describe routine preparedness without endorsing imminent strikes, while stalled diplomatic talks persist; traders assess barriers like international backlash and Cuba's defenses against limited options such as airstrikes or special operations before year-end.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jourAction militaire américaine contre Cuba par... ?
Action militaire américaine contre Cuba par... ?
$3,118,062 Vol.
31 décembre
40%
$3,118,062 Vol.
31 décembre
40%
For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Marché ouvert : Jan 4, 2026, 3:08 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, a qualifying "strike" is defined as the use of aerial bombs, drones, or missiles (including FPV and ATGM strikes as well as cruise or ballistic missiles) launched by any United States operatives, including military forces, intelligence agencies, or other U.S. government operatives, that physically impact ground territory within the listed country.
A strike on any area within the terrestrial territory (including rivers, lakes, ports, but excluding territorial sea) of the listed country counts.
Missiles or drones that are intercepted and surface-to-air missile strikes will not be sufficient for a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they land territory or cause damage.
Actions such as artillery fire, small arms fire, ground incursions, naval shelling, or cyberattacks will not qualify.
Any strike occurring during this market’s timeframe that is claimed by either Donald Trump or the U.S. government will qualify.
The primary resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This market will remain open until the end of the second day after the resolution time. If the date/time of a qualifying strike cannot be confirmed by a consensus of credible reporting by that time, it will resolve to "No" regardless of whether a strike was later confirmed to have taken place.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Recent disclosures of the Pentagon quietly accelerating contingency planning for potential military operations in Cuba, as reported April 15, have intensified US-Cuba tensions, driving trader focus on escalation risks. President Trump's April 13 remark hinting at action post-Iran conflict, coupled with Cuban President Díaz-Canel's April 16 vow to repel invasion on the Bay of Pigs anniversary, signals heightened rhetoric amid Havana's energy crisis from the US oil blockade following January's Maduro capture in Venezuela. US officials describe routine preparedness without endorsing imminent strikes, while stalled diplomatic talks persist; traders assess barriers like international backlash and Cuba's defenses against limited options such as airstrikes or special operations before year-end.
Résumé expérimental généré par IA à partir des données Polymarket. Ceci n'est pas un conseil de trading et ne joue aucun rôle dans la résolution de ce marché. · Mis à jour
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Méfiez-vous des liens externes.
Questions fréquentes