The close contest around the California initiative prohibiting new personal property taxes on assets like retirement accounts and financial holdings, along with limits on certain retroactive taxes effective after January 1, 2026, reflects competing ballot measures including a proposed billionaire wealth tax that would apply based on residency status from early in the year. Qualification of the prohibition measure in June created direct conflict provisions, where the initiative receiving more votes would prevail on overlapping tax rules, while fiscal estimates highlight potential future revenue reductions and legal debates over due process in retroactive applications. Voter sentiment balances concerns over state revenue needs against protections for savings and investment planning, with outcomes sensitive to turnout among different economic groups, campaign messaging on tax fairness, and any late shifts in polling or endorsements ahead of the November election.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · ActualizadoPropuesta de prohibición de impuestos retroactivos de California
Propuesta de prohibición de impuestos retroactivos de California
Sí
49% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
3 nov 2026
Sí
49% probabilidad
NUEVO
NUEVO
3 nov 2026
Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).The close contest around the California initiative prohibiting new personal property taxes on assets like retirement accounts and financial holdings, along with limits on certain retroactive taxes effective after January 1, 2026, reflects competing ballot measures including a proposed billionaire wealth tax that would apply based on residency status from early in the year. Qualification of the prohibition measure in June created direct conflict provisions, where the initiative receiving more votes would prevail on overlapping tax rules, while fiscal estimates highlight potential future revenue reductions and legal debates over due process in retroactive applications. Voter sentiment balances concerns over state revenue needs against protections for savings and investment planning, with outcomes sensitive to turnout among different economic groups, campaign messaging on tax fairness, and any late shifts in polling or endorsements ahead of the November election.
Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
Mercado abierto: Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ET
Volumen
$0Fecha de finalización
3 nov 2026Mercado abierto
Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).The close contest around the California initiative prohibiting new personal property taxes on assets like retirement accounts and financial holdings, along with limits on certain retroactive taxes effective after January 1, 2026, reflects competing ballot measures including a proposed billionaire wealth tax that would apply based on residency status from early in the year. Qualification of the prohibition measure in June created direct conflict provisions, where the initiative receiving more votes would prevail on overlapping tax rules, while fiscal estimates highlight potential future revenue reductions and legal debates over due process in retroactive applications. Voter sentiment balances concerns over state revenue needs against protections for savings and investment planning, with outcomes sensitive to turnout among different economic groups, campaign messaging on tax fairness, and any late shifts in polling or endorsements ahead of the November election.
Proposition 42 is a California ballot measure currently scheduled for voting on November 3, 2026. It would prevent retroactive taxes and new taxes on personal property, which would offset the proposed wealth tax in Proposition 40.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
Volumen
$0Fecha de finalización
3 nov 2026Mercado abierto
Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The close contest around the California initiative prohibiting new personal property taxes on assets like retirement accounts and financial holdings, along with limits on certain retroactive taxes effective after January 1, 2026, reflects competing ballot measures including a proposed billionaire wealth tax that would apply based on residency status from early in the year. Qualification of the prohibition measure in June created direct conflict provisions, where the initiative receiving more votes would prevail on overlapping tax rules, while fiscal estimates highlight potential future revenue reductions and legal debates over due process in retroactive applications. Voter sentiment balances concerns over state revenue needs against protections for savings and investment planning, with outcomes sensitive to turnout among different economic groups, campaign messaging on tax fairness, and any late shifts in polling or endorsements ahead of the November election.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes