Trader consensus prices Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, draw, and Vladimir Fedoseev at even 50.5% implied probabilities for their Grand Chess Tour Super Rapid & Blitz Poland 2026 Rapid Round 9 clash, underscoring a razor-thin matchup in the volatile 25+10 time control format. Fedoseev leads the tournament with 5 points after 8 rounds, fueled by key upsets over Fabiano Caruana and Alireza Firouzja, while Vachier-Lagrave sits lower at 3 points following early losses to those same rivals but recent draws and wins signaling recovery. Their near-identical FIDE ratings (MVL 2735, Fedoseev 2690) and Fedoseev's prior blitz win over MVL in 2025 Poland keep expectations balanced, with rapid chess prone to blunders and swings regardless of form.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedAll Sports
MLB
UFC
All
MLS
Bolivian Primera División
Brasileirão Série A
UEL
UEFA Conference League
Eliteserien
Chinese Super League
Brasileirão Série B
NWSL
Liga MX
Copa Sudamericana
Liga 1
Allsvenskan
ÖFB Cup
UCL
SuperLiga
USL League One
Australia Cup
Chance Liga
Liga de Primera
Categoría Primera A
K League 1
Danish Superliga
Niké liga
Liga FPD
Scottish Premiership
NB I
TFF Süper Kupa
Women's Champions League
J2 League
Copa do Brasil
Liga Nacional de Guatemala
Ukrainian Premier League
Premier League
LaLiga
Bundesliga
Ligue 1
Serie A
Liga Profesional de Fútbol
EFL CUP
Leagues Cup
Prva Liga
Primeira Liga
Saudi Pro League
Hockey
Table Tennis
Volleyball
Golf
Cycling
Poker
Chess
Pickleball
Lacrosse
Esports
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave – Vladimir Fedoseev
Moneyline
$1.1K Vol.
If Vladimir Fedoseev wins, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the match has been completed.
If the match is canceled entirely, with no make-up match, this market will resolve "No".
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Market Opened: May 6, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
Resolution Source
https://lichess.org/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Maxime Vachier-Lagrave – Vladimir Fedoseev
Moneyline
$1.1K Vol.
If Vladimir Fedoseev wins, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
If the match is postponed, this market will remain open until the match has been completed.
If the match is canceled entirely, with no make-up match, this market will resolve "No".
The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Market Opened: May 6, 2026, 11:29 AM ET
Resolution Source
https://lichess.org/Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Trader consensus prices Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, draw, and Vladimir Fedoseev at even 50.5% implied probabilities for their Grand Chess Tour Super Rapid & Blitz Poland 2026 Rapid Round 9 clash, underscoring a razor-thin matchup in the volatile 25+10 time control format. Fedoseev leads the tournament with 5 points after 8 rounds, fueled by key upsets over Fabiano Caruana and Alireza Firouzja, while Vachier-Lagrave sits lower at 3 points following early losses to those same rivals but recent draws and wins signaling recovery. Their near-identical FIDE ratings (MVL 2735, Fedoseev 2690) and Fedoseev's prior blitz win over MVL in 2025 Poland keep expectations balanced, with rapid chess prone to blunders and swings regardless of form.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedBeware of external links.
Beware of external links.


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions