Multiple large language models, including Chinese systems like dots-note-3.0 and Huawei’s Celia, achieved perfect 42/42 scores or gold-medal thresholds on the official IMO 2026 problems in independent post-competition evaluations after the July event in Shanghai. Frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others similarly reached or exceeded the 29-point gold cutoff in controlled tests. However, the IMO remains strictly limited to human contestants under age 20, with no official AI entry, participation, or medal awards permitted under current rules. This structural barrier, combined with the absence of regulatory or organizational changes allowing AI competitors, underpins the strong trader consensus favoring “No” at 87.1% implied probability. Upcoming catalysts appear limited absent formal policy shifts.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoAI wins IMO gold medal in 2026?
AI wins IMO gold medal in 2026?
13% probabilità
$31,621 Vol.
$31,621 Vol.
31 dic 2026
13% probabilità
$31,621 Vol.
$31,621 Vol.
31 dic 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any AI gets a gold medal in the International Math Olympiad between January 1, 2026 and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise this market will resolve to "No."
The resolution source is the IMO Grand Challenge (https://imo-grand-challenge.github.io/) and the Artificial Intelligence Math Olympiad (AIMO, https://aimoprize.com/). If either source demonstrates that an AI has won the challenge/prize before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes".Multiple large language models, including Chinese systems like dots-note-3.0 and Huawei’s Celia, achieved perfect 42/42 scores or gold-medal thresholds on the official IMO 2026 problems in independent post-competition evaluations after the July event in Shanghai. Frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others similarly reached or exceeded the 29-point gold cutoff in controlled tests. However, the IMO remains strictly limited to human contestants under age 20, with no official AI entry, participation, or medal awards permitted under current rules. This structural barrier, combined with the absence of regulatory or organizational changes allowing AI competitors, underpins the strong trader consensus favoring “No” at 87.1% implied probability. Upcoming catalysts appear limited absent formal policy shifts.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any AI gets a gold medal in the International Math Olympiad between January 1, 2026 and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise this market will resolve to "No."
The resolution source is the IMO Grand Challenge (https://imo-grand-challenge.github.io/) and the Artificial Intelligence Math Olympiad (AIMO, https://aimoprize.com/). If either source demonstrates that an AI has won the challenge/prize before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes".
The resolution source is the IMO Grand Challenge (https://imo-grand-challenge.github.io/) and the Artificial Intelligence Math Olympiad (AIMO, https://aimoprize.com/). If either source demonstrates that an AI has won the challenge/prize before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Mercato aperto: Nov 12, 2025, 5:08 PM ET
Volume
$31,621Data di fine
1 gen 2027Mercato aperto
Nov 12, 2025, 5:08 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if any AI gets a gold medal in the International Math Olympiad between January 1, 2026 and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise this market will resolve to "No."
The resolution source is the IMO Grand Challenge (https://imo-grand-challenge.github.io/) and the Artificial Intelligence Math Olympiad (AIMO, https://aimoprize.com/). If either source demonstrates that an AI has won the challenge/prize before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes".Multiple large language models, including Chinese systems like dots-note-3.0 and Huawei’s Celia, achieved perfect 42/42 scores or gold-medal thresholds on the official IMO 2026 problems in independent post-competition evaluations after the July event in Shanghai. Frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others similarly reached or exceeded the 29-point gold cutoff in controlled tests. However, the IMO remains strictly limited to human contestants under age 20, with no official AI entry, participation, or medal awards permitted under current rules. This structural barrier, combined with the absence of regulatory or organizational changes allowing AI competitors, underpins the strong trader consensus favoring “No” at 87.1% implied probability. Upcoming catalysts appear limited absent formal policy shifts.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any AI gets a gold medal in the International Math Olympiad between January 1, 2026 and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise this market will resolve to "No."
The resolution source is the IMO Grand Challenge (https://imo-grand-challenge.github.io/) and the Artificial Intelligence Math Olympiad (AIMO, https://aimoprize.com/). If either source demonstrates that an AI has won the challenge/prize before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes".
The resolution source is the IMO Grand Challenge (https://imo-grand-challenge.github.io/) and the Artificial Intelligence Math Olympiad (AIMO, https://aimoprize.com/). If either source demonstrates that an AI has won the challenge/prize before the resolution date, this market will resolve to "Yes".
Volume
$31,621Data di fine
1 gen 2027Mercato aperto
Nov 12, 2025, 5:08 PM ETRisolutore
0x65070BE91...Multiple large language models, including Chinese systems like dots-note-3.0 and Huawei’s Celia, achieved perfect 42/42 scores or gold-medal thresholds on the official IMO 2026 problems in independent post-competition evaluations after the July event in Shanghai. Frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and others similarly reached or exceeded the 29-point gold cutoff in controlled tests. However, the IMO remains strictly limited to human contestants under age 20, with no official AI entry, participation, or medal awards permitted under current rules. This structural barrier, combined with the absence of regulatory or organizational changes allowing AI competitors, underpins the strong trader consensus favoring “No” at 87.1% implied probability. Upcoming catalysts appear limited absent formal policy shifts.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti