Anthropic’s late-May release of Claude Opus 4.8, following strong SWE-bench Verified scores from Opus 4.7, has solidified trader consensus around its leadership in coding large language models. Developers highlight the model’s superior instruction-following, agentic workflows, and performance on real GitHub issue resolution compared with OpenAI’s GPT-5 series and Google’s Gemini releases. Widespread adoption through Claude Code tooling and consistent benchmark edges in autonomous software engineering tasks reinforce this positioning. A late surge by a competitor model on the specific end-of-May evaluation criteria or an unexpected shift in third-party coding leaderboards could still alter the outcome before resolution.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · ZaktualizowanoWhich company has the best Coding AI model end of May?
Which company has the best Coding AI model end of May?
Anthropic 100.0%
OpenAI <1%
xAI <1%
Baidu <1%
$120,519 Wol.
$120,519 Wol.
May 30, 2026
Anthropic
Yes
OpenAI
No
xAI
No
Baidu
No
Amazon
No
Mistral
No
Meituan
No
Microsoft
No
No
Alibaba
No
ByteDance
No
Moonshot
No
Z.ai
No
DeepSeek
No
Meta
No
Anthropic 100.0%
OpenAI <1%
xAI <1%
Baidu <1%
$120,519 Wol.
$120,519 Wol.
May 30, 2026
Anthropic
$25,306 Wol.
Yes
OpenAI
$16,471 Wol.
No
xAI
$8,248 Wol.
No
Baidu
$4,386 Wol.
No
Amazon
$1,058 Wol.
No
Mistral
$986 Wol.
No
Meituan
$1,139 Wol.
No
Microsoft
$1,110 Wol.
No
$13,354 Wol.
No
Alibaba
$4,491 Wol.
No
ByteDance
$4,216 Wol.
No
Moonshot
$9,954 Wol.
No
Z.ai
$15,867 Wol.
No
DeepSeek
$9,579 Wol.
No
Meta
$4,354 Wol.
No
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model that has the highest arena rank based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab for "Coding" is checked on May 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.Anthropic’s late-May release of Claude Opus 4.8, following strong SWE-bench Verified scores from Opus 4.7, has solidified trader consensus around its leadership in coding large language models. Developers highlight the model’s superior instruction-following, agentic workflows, and performance on real GitHub issue resolution compared with OpenAI’s GPT-5 series and Google’s Gemini releases. Widespread adoption through Claude Code tooling and consistent benchmark edges in autonomous software engineering tasks reinforce this positioning. A late surge by a competitor model on the specific end-of-May evaluation criteria or an unexpected shift in third-party coding leaderboards could still alter the outcome before resolution.
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model that has the highest arena rank based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab for "Coding" is checked on May 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Rynek otwarty: Apr 27, 2026, 5:49 PM ET
Wolumen
$120,519Data zakończenia
May 31, 2026Rynek otwarty
Apr 27, 2026, 5:49 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Wynik zaproponowany: Yes
Brak sporu
Ostateczny wynik: Yes
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model that has the highest arena rank based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab for "Coding" is checked on May 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.Anthropic’s late-May release of Claude Opus 4.8, following strong SWE-bench Verified scores from Opus 4.7, has solidified trader consensus around its leadership in coding large language models. Developers highlight the model’s superior instruction-following, agentic workflows, and performance on real GitHub issue resolution compared with OpenAI’s GPT-5 series and Google’s Gemini releases. Widespread adoption through Claude Code tooling and consistent benchmark edges in autonomous software engineering tasks reinforce this positioning. A late surge by a competitor model on the specific end-of-May evaluation criteria or an unexpected shift in third-party coding leaderboards could still alter the outcome before resolution.
This market will resolve according to the company that owns the model that has the highest arena rank based on the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab for "Coding" is checked on May 31, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Results from the "Rank" column under the "Text Arena | Coding" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/text/coding-no-style-control with style control off will be used to resolve this market.
Models will be ordered primarily by their leaderboard rank at the market’s check time. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by their Arena score, including any underlying, unrounded, granular values reflected in the data below the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., if the two models are tied by exact arena score, “Google” would be ranked ahead of “xAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies first place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard found at https://lmarena.ai/. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve based on another resolution source.
Wolumen
$120,519Data zakończenia
May 31, 2026Rynek otwarty
Apr 27, 2026, 5:49 PM ETRozstrzygający
0x69c47De9D...Wynik zaproponowany: Yes
Brak sporu
Ostateczny wynik: Yes
Anthropic’s late-May release of Claude Opus 4.8, following strong SWE-bench Verified scores from Opus 4.7, has solidified trader consensus around its leadership in coding large language models. Developers highlight the model’s superior instruction-following, agentic workflows, and performance on real GitHub issue resolution compared with OpenAI’s GPT-5 series and Google’s Gemini releases. Widespread adoption through Claude Code tooling and consistent benchmark edges in autonomous software engineering tasks reinforce this positioning. A late surge by a competitor model on the specific end-of-May evaluation criteria or an unexpected shift in third-party coding leaderboards could still alter the outcome before resolution.
Eksperymentalne podsumowanie AI odwołujące się do danych Polymarket. To nie jest porada handlowa i nie ma wpływu na rozstrzyganie tego rynku. · Zaktualizowano
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Uważaj na linki zewnętrzne.
Często zadawane pytania