Trader consensus heavily favors no Iranian sabotage of undersea internet cables by April 30, reflecting the absence of any confirmed incidents or intelligence leaks indicating preparations despite Middle East tensions. Recent developments, including Iran's restraint amid Israel-Hamas hostilities and Houthi Red Sea disruptions, show Tehran's focus on proxy actions rather than high-risk direct infrastructure attacks, which could provoke severe Western retaliation. U.S. and allied naval patrols in vulnerable chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz add deterrence, while no official Iranian threats or capability demonstrations have emerged. With the deadline nearing and zero disruptions reported, traders price in low feasibility and geopolitical costs outweighing gains.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於是
是
Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: Mar 23, 2026, 6:23 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus heavily favors no Iranian sabotage of undersea internet cables by April 30, reflecting the absence of any confirmed incidents or intelligence leaks indicating preparations despite Middle East tensions. Recent developments, including Iran's restraint amid Israel-Hamas hostilities and Houthi Red Sea disruptions, show Tehran's focus on proxy actions rather than high-risk direct infrastructure attacks, which could provoke severe Western retaliation. U.S. and allied naval patrols in vulnerable chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz add deterrence, while no official Iranian threats or capability demonstrations have emerged. With the deadline nearing and zero disruptions reported, traders price in low feasibility and geopolitical costs outweighing gains.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions