The Supreme Court’s review of Executive Order 14160, which seeks to deny birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants and certain temporary visa holders under a narrow reading of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, has produced consistent signals that the order exceeds executive authority. Every lower federal court to examine the measure has blocked it, citing longstanding precedent from United States v. Wong Kim Ark and the clause’s text as codified in statute. Oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara reinforced this pattern, with multiple justices expressing skepticism toward the administration’s position. Traders assign a 95.2 percent probability that the Court will strike down the order because these factors align with established constitutional interpretation. A decision is expected by early July 2026; the only realistic variables that could alter the outcome involve an unanticipated change in the Court’s approach before final ruling.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · AktualisiertJa
$159,909 Vol.
$159,909 Vol.
Ja
$159,909 Vol.
$159,909 Vol.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Markt eröffnet: Mar 31, 2026, 2:54 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the Supreme Court of the United States rules that Donald Trump’s Executive Order “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” may not be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, by July 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying ruling must clearly and finally rule that the order, in whole, is unconstitutional or cannot lawfully take effect, or that the order cannot be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States.
Procedural rulings that do not clearly resolve whether the order may lawfully be enforced to deny citizenship to children born in the United States will not be sufficient to resolve this market to “Yes”.
If a Supreme Court ruling on this case clearly and finally permits the order to deny citizenship to children born in the United States, this market will resolve to “No”.
If the Executive Order is withdrawn prior to any qualifying Supreme Court ruling on the order, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from the Supreme Court of the United States; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Supreme Court’s review of Executive Order 14160, which seeks to deny birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants and certain temporary visa holders under a narrow reading of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, has produced consistent signals that the order exceeds executive authority. Every lower federal court to examine the measure has blocked it, citing longstanding precedent from United States v. Wong Kim Ark and the clause’s text as codified in statute. Oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara reinforced this pattern, with multiple justices expressing skepticism toward the administration’s position. Traders assign a 95.2 percent probability that the Court will strike down the order because these factors align with established constitutional interpretation. A decision is expected by early July 2026; the only realistic variables that could alter the outcome involve an unanticipated change in the Court’s approach before final ruling.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen