Recent leaderboard updates on Code Arena: WebDev show OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 securing the top two lab positions through superior agentic coding and multi-step web development performance. This leaves a tight contest for third place among Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max, Moonshot’s Kimi K3, and Meta’s Muse Spark models, where Alibaba holds a narrow edge from its September snapshot gains but faces volatility from fewer votes and overlapping confidence intervals. Recent allegations of large-scale distillation from Claude outputs by Chinese labs add uncertainty around long-term capability claims. Traders price these dynamics as a closely contested outcome, sensitive to any late-September model releases or benchmark refreshes before month-end resolution.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · AktualisiertAlibaba 34%
Moonshot 27%
SpaceXAI 25.7%
Anthropic 5.3%
$40,891 Vol.
$40,891 Vol.
30. Sep. 2026
Alibaba
34%
Moonshot
27%
SpaceXAI
31%
Anthropic
5%
OpenAI
4%
Z.ai
2%
DeepSeek
1%
1%
MiniMax
1%
Thinky
1%
Tencent
1%
Poolside
1%
Mistral
<1%
Meta
<1%
ByteDance
<1%
Xiaomi
<1%
Alibaba 34%
Moonshot 27%
SpaceXAI 25.7%
Anthropic 5.3%
$40,891 Vol.
$40,891 Vol.
30. Sep. 2026
Alibaba
$13,295 Vol.
34%
Moonshot
$10,221 Vol.
27%
SpaceXAI
$2,126 Vol.
31%
Anthropic
$3,376 Vol.
5%
OpenAI
$1,619 Vol.
4%
Z.ai
$1,188 Vol.
2%
DeepSeek
$1,141 Vol.
1%
$1,225 Vol.
1%
MiniMax
$469 Vol.
1%
Thinky
$942 Vol.
1%
Tencent
$636 Vol.
1%
Poolside
$895 Vol.
1%
Mistral
$679 Vol.
<1%
Meta
$1,161 Vol.
<1%
ByteDance
$952 Vol.
<1%
Xiaomi
$965 Vol.
<1%
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Recent leaderboard updates on Code Arena: WebDev show OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 securing the top two lab positions through superior agentic coding and multi-step web development performance. This leaves a tight contest for third place among Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max, Moonshot’s Kimi K3, and Meta’s Muse Spark models, where Alibaba holds a narrow edge from its September snapshot gains but faces volatility from fewer votes and overlapping confidence intervals. Recent allegations of large-scale distillation from Claude outputs by Chinese labs add uncertainty around long-term capability claims. Traders price these dynamics as a closely contested outcome, sensitive to any late-September model releases or benchmark refreshes before month-end resolution.
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Markt eröffnet: Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ET
Volumen
$40,891Enddatum
1. Okt. 2026Markt eröffnet
Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ETAbwicklungsquelle
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsAbwickler
0x69c47De9D...This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".Recent leaderboard updates on Code Arena: WebDev show OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 securing the top two lab positions through superior agentic coding and multi-step web development performance. This leaves a tight contest for third place among Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max, Moonshot’s Kimi K3, and Meta’s Muse Spark models, where Alibaba holds a narrow edge from its September snapshot gains but faces volatility from fewer votes and overlapping confidence intervals. Recent allegations of large-scale distillation from Claude outputs by Chinese labs add uncertainty around long-term capability claims. Traders price these dynamics as a closely contested outcome, sensitive to any late-September model releases or benchmark refreshes before month-end resolution.
This market will resolve according to the third-highest ranked Company based on the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard when the table under "Code Arena | WebDev" filtered for "Labs" is checked on September 30, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Volumen
$40,891Enddatum
1. Okt. 2026Markt eröffnet
Jul 24, 2026, 7:46 PM ETAbwicklungsquelle
https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labsAbwickler
0x69c47De9D...Recent leaderboard updates on Code Arena: WebDev show OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra and Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 securing the top two lab positions through superior agentic coding and multi-step web development performance. This leaves a tight contest for third place among Alibaba’s Qwen3.8-Max, Moonshot’s Kimi K3, and Meta’s Muse Spark models, where Alibaba holds a narrow edge from its September snapshot gains but faces volatility from fewer votes and overlapping confidence intervals. Recent allegations of large-scale distillation from Claude outputs by Chinese labs add uncertainty around long-term capability claims. Traders price these dynamics as a closely contested outcome, sensitive to any late-September model releases or benchmark refreshes before month-end resolution.
Experimentelle KI-generierte Zusammenfassung mit Polymarket-Daten. Dies ist keine Handelsberatung und spielt keine Rolle bei der Auflösung dieses Marktes. · Aktualisiert
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Vorsicht bei externen Links.
Häufig gestellte Fragen