The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, without a successor agreement remains the central driver of trader positioning on any U.S.-Russia nuclear arms control deal. Russia had proposed in September 2025 to continue observing the treaty’s central numerical limits for one additional year, but the United States did not accept the offer and instead signaled interest in a broader, modernized agreement that would incorporate China and address all warhead types. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the conflict in Ukraine, have limited diplomatic channels, while U.S. statements emphasize multilateral strategic stability talks over bilateral limits. No formal negotiations or breakthroughs have been reported since the treaty’s lapse, leaving near-term resolution dependent on shifts in bilateral relations or trilateral engagement involving Beijing.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedU.S. x Russia Nuclear deal by...?
$630,175 Vol.
September 30
3%
December 31
21%
$630,175 Vol.
September 30
3%
December 31
21%
Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Market Opened: Jul 29, 2026, 2:38 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The expiration of the New START treaty on February 5, 2026, without a successor agreement remains the central driver of trader positioning on any U.S.-Russia nuclear arms control deal. Russia had proposed in September 2025 to continue observing the treaty’s central numerical limits for one additional year, but the United States did not accept the offer and instead signaled interest in a broader, modernized agreement that would incorporate China and address all warhead types. Ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the conflict in Ukraine, have limited diplomatic channels, while U.S. statements emphasize multilateral strategic stability talks over bilateral limits. No formal negotiations or breakthroughs have been reported since the treaty’s lapse, leaving near-term resolution dependent on shifts in bilateral relations or trilateral engagement involving Beijing.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions