The expiration of the New START Treaty on February 5, 2026, removed the last binding U.S.-Russia limits on deployed strategic nuclear warheads and delivery systems, shifting focus to whether a successor agreement can be reached. President Trump has called for a modernized bilateral or multilateral pact that incorporates China and covers a broader range of warheads, while Russian officials have signaled willingness to observe existing numerical limits on a reciprocal basis provided verification issues are addressed. Diplomatic contacts, including February talks on the sidelines of Ukraine-related discussions in Abu Dhabi, produced no formal extension or new framework. Trader sentiment reflects uncertainty over timelines for renewed negotiations, the complexity of bringing in additional parties, and the absence of scheduled summits or verification mechanisms that could accelerate progress before potential deadlines.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedU.S. x Russia Nuclear deal by...?
$630,175 Vol.
September 30
9%
December 31
22%
$630,175 Vol.
September 30
9%
December 31
22%
Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Market Opened: Jul 29, 2026, 2:38 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only agreements that are publicly announced and acknowledged by both the U.S. and Russia will qualify. The agreement must pertain to nuclear arms control or limitation—such as a treaty, framework, or memorandum—addressing matters including (but not limited to) nuclear warheads, delivery systems, verification mechanisms, or strategic stability.
An extension, amendment, or replacement of the New START treaty will qualify, provided it is publicly announced as a concluded agreement by both parties within the time frame. Exploratory discussions or stated intent to extend without a finalized agreement will not qualify.
Agreements that include both the United States and Russia as named parties—whether bilateral or as part of a broader multilateral framework—will qualify, provided the agreement directly addresses nuclear arms control.
The agreement does not need to be ratified or implemented for this market to resolve "Yes"; a formal announcement of a concluded agreement is sufficient.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements from the U.S. government (e.g., the White House, State Department) and/or the Russian Federation (e.g., the Kremlin, Ministry of Foreign Affairs). However, a clear and overwhelming consensus of credible reporting confirming that such an agreement has been reached will also qualify.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The expiration of the New START Treaty on February 5, 2026, removed the last binding U.S.-Russia limits on deployed strategic nuclear warheads and delivery systems, shifting focus to whether a successor agreement can be reached. President Trump has called for a modernized bilateral or multilateral pact that incorporates China and covers a broader range of warheads, while Russian officials have signaled willingness to observe existing numerical limits on a reciprocal basis provided verification issues are addressed. Diplomatic contacts, including February talks on the sidelines of Ukraine-related discussions in Abu Dhabi, produced no formal extension or new framework. Trader sentiment reflects uncertainty over timelines for renewed negotiations, the complexity of bringing in additional parties, and the absence of scheduled summits or verification mechanisms that could accelerate progress before potential deadlines.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated



Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions