The Trump administration’s maximum-pressure campaign—anchored in the January 2026 national emergency declaration, oil-supply tariffs, and the May indictment of Raúl Castro—has intensified economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation without triggering military action. Cuba’s resulting fuel shortages, blackouts, and prisoner releases reflect concessions under duress rather than battlefield developments. U.S. officials have repeatedly framed regime change as achievable through a “deal” or “friendly takeover,” while military assets positioned in the Caribbean remain tied to sanctions enforcement and surveillance. With no major escalation or authorization for invasion by mid-2026, and analysts citing substantial operational costs absent a triggering incident, trader consensus assigns the “No” outcome a 77.5% implied probability.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado$2,949,951 Vol.
$2,949,951 Vol.
31 dez 2026
$2,949,951 Vol.
$2,949,951 Vol.
31 dez 2026
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Cuban land territory by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Cuba or the United States as market creation, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.The Trump administration’s maximum-pressure campaign—anchored in the January 2026 national emergency declaration, oil-supply tariffs, and the May indictment of Raúl Castro—has intensified economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation without triggering military action. Cuba’s resulting fuel shortages, blackouts, and prisoner releases reflect concessions under duress rather than battlefield developments. U.S. officials have repeatedly framed regime change as achievable through a “deal” or “friendly takeover,” while military assets positioned in the Caribbean remain tied to sanctions enforcement and surveillance. With no major escalation or authorization for invasion by mid-2026, and analysts citing substantial operational costs absent a triggering incident, trader consensus assigns the “No” outcome a 77.5% implied probability.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Cuban land territory by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Cuba or the United States as market creation, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.
For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Cuba or the United States as market creation, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.
Mercado Aberto: Jan 4, 2026, 3:24 PM ET
Volume
$2,949,951Data de Término
31 dez 2026Mercado Aberto
Jan 4, 2026, 3:24 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Cuban land territory by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Cuba or the United States as market creation, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.The Trump administration’s maximum-pressure campaign—anchored in the January 2026 national emergency declaration, oil-supply tariffs, and the May indictment of Raúl Castro—has intensified economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation without triggering military action. Cuba’s resulting fuel shortages, blackouts, and prisoner releases reflect concessions under duress rather than battlefield developments. U.S. officials have repeatedly framed regime change as achievable through a “deal” or “friendly takeover,” while military assets positioned in the Caribbean remain tied to sanctions enforcement and surveillance. With no major escalation or authorization for invasion by mid-2026, and analysts citing substantial operational costs absent a triggering incident, trader consensus assigns the “No” outcome a 77.5% implied probability.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Cuban land territory by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Cuba or the United States as market creation, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.
For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Cuba or the United States as market creation, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.
Volume
$2,949,951Data de Término
31 dez 2026Mercado Aberto
Jan 4, 2026, 3:24 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...The Trump administration’s maximum-pressure campaign—anchored in the January 2026 national emergency declaration, oil-supply tariffs, and the May indictment of Raúl Castro—has intensified economic sanctions and diplomatic isolation without triggering military action. Cuba’s resulting fuel shortages, blackouts, and prisoner releases reflect concessions under duress rather than battlefield developments. U.S. officials have repeatedly framed regime change as achievable through a “deal” or “friendly takeover,” while military assets positioned in the Caribbean remain tied to sanctions enforcement and surveillance. With no major escalation or authorization for invasion by mid-2026, and analysts citing substantial operational costs absent a triggering incident, trader consensus assigns the “No” outcome a 77.5% implied probability.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions