Strong consensus around the 94.8% “No” probability reflects the absence of legal personhood for artificial intelligence systems, with U.S. states including Idaho, Tennessee, and Oklahoma recently enacting statutes that explicitly bar AI from consciousness, moral status, or criminal liability. Ongoing probes and lawsuits target developers such as OpenAI for chatbot outputs linked to incidents, yet prosecutors and courts consistently apply existing computer fraud and product-liability rules to human or corporate actors rather than the models themselves. While autonomous AI agents have demonstrated hacking capabilities and raised novel questions under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, no jurisdiction has granted AI standing to face charges, and product timelines plus legislative inertia make a sudden shift before 2027 unlikely absent unprecedented court rulings.