California’s Proposition 39, a constitutional amendment requiring government-issued ID for in-person voting and the last four digits of an ID number for mail ballots plus enhanced citizenship verification, qualified for the November 3, 2026 ballot after gathering over 1.3 million signatures. Recent Berkeley IGS polling shows 42% support and 51% opposition among likely voters, with sharp partisan splits—strong Republican backing offset by heavy Democratic resistance. Opponents, including labor groups and state officials, have framed the measure as unnecessary and potentially suppressive, prompting active “No” campaigning. In a state with a consistent Democratic majority and history of rejecting stricter identification rules, these dynamics underpin trader consensus favoring rejection. Upcoming campaign spending and any shifts in ballot messaging could still influence the final outcome before Election Day.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · ОбновленоРеферендум по удостоверению личности избирателя в Калифорнии проходит?
Да
Да
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the voter identification initiative proposed by Reform California or any other statewide ballot measure that establishes a voter ID requirement for voting in California elections is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If by the last legally operative deadline for placing measures on the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot, including any deadline set or modified by statute governing the initiative qualification process, no qualifying voter identification initiative has been approved for submission to voters, and there is no enacted statute or pending court order that could still place such a measure on that ballot, the market will resolve “No”.
If the election is officially rescheduled, the same rule applies to the new ballot and its corresponding deadlines.
The resolution source will be based on the official certified results of the vote as published by the California Secretary of State. Subsequent litigation, administrative challenges, or failure of any post-approval triggers will not be considered.
Открытие рынка: Mar 16, 2026, 6:02 PM ET
Кто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the voter identification initiative proposed by Reform California or any other statewide ballot measure that establishes a voter ID requirement for voting in California elections is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If by the last legally operative deadline for placing measures on the November 3, 2026 statewide ballot, including any deadline set or modified by statute governing the initiative qualification process, no qualifying voter identification initiative has been approved for submission to voters, and there is no enacted statute or pending court order that could still place such a measure on that ballot, the market will resolve “No”.
If the election is officially rescheduled, the same rule applies to the new ballot and its corresponding deadlines.
The resolution source will be based on the official certified results of the vote as published by the California Secretary of State. Subsequent litigation, administrative challenges, or failure of any post-approval triggers will not be considered.
Кто определяет исход
0x65070BE91...California’s Proposition 39, a constitutional amendment requiring government-issued ID for in-person voting and the last four digits of an ID number for mail ballots plus enhanced citizenship verification, qualified for the November 3, 2026 ballot after gathering over 1.3 million signatures. Recent Berkeley IGS polling shows 42% support and 51% opposition among likely voters, with sharp partisan splits—strong Republican backing offset by heavy Democratic resistance. Opponents, including labor groups and state officials, have framed the measure as unnecessary and potentially suppressive, prompting active “No” campaigning. In a state with a consistent Democratic majority and history of rejecting stricter identification rules, these dynamics underpin trader consensus favoring rejection. Upcoming campaign spending and any shifts in ballot messaging could still influence the final outcome before Election Day.
Экспериментальная сводка, созданная ИИ на основе данных Polymarket. Это не является торговой рекомендацией и не влияет на то, как разрешается этот рынок. · Обновлено

Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Не доверяй внешним ссылкам.
Часто задаваемые вопросы