Traders assign near-certainty to the outcome that Donald Trump will not insult Xi Jinping this week, reflecting the current diplomatic posture between the United States and China. Ongoing bilateral trade discussions and strategic communications have emphasized restraint rather than public confrontation, consistent with patterns seen during periods of active negotiations. This consensus among prediction market participants incorporates skin-in-the-game assessments of recent statements and scheduled engagements. Even with such elevated implied probability, late-breaking developments such as an unexpected public remark, escalation in tariff talks, or a diplomatic incident could still alter the result before the week concludes.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於特朗普本周是否會侮辱習近平?
是
$459,253 交易量
$459,253 交易量
是
$459,253 交易量
$459,253 交易量
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: May 11, 2026, 4:18 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...已提議結果: 否
無爭議
最終結果: 否
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...已提議結果: 否
無爭議
最終結果: 否
Traders assign near-certainty to the outcome that Donald Trump will not insult Xi Jinping this week, reflecting the current diplomatic posture between the United States and China. Ongoing bilateral trade discussions and strategic communications have emphasized restraint rather than public confrontation, consistent with patterns seen during periods of active negotiations. This consensus among prediction market participants incorporates skin-in-the-game assessments of recent statements and scheduled engagements. Even with such elevated implied probability, late-breaking developments such as an unexpected public remark, escalation in tariff talks, or a diplomatic incident could still alter the result before the week concludes.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於



警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions