President Trump has repeatedly discussed invoking the Insurrection Act to support immigration enforcement and respond to related protests, including threats tied to ICE operations and unrest in Minnesota earlier in 2026, yet Defense and Homeland Security officials recommended against it citing reduced border crossings. Courts have limited alternative deployment authorities in cases like Trump v. Illinois, heightening focus on the Act's broad presidential discretion while underscoring historical restraint and narrow application precedents. With November midterms approaching, trader consensus reflects low near-term odds due to institutional caution, though escalation from protests, election disputes, or policy shifts could alter probabilities before year-end resolution.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于$1,130,230 交易量
9月30日
2%
12月31日
15%
$1,130,230 交易量
9月30日
2%
12月31日
15%
For the purposes of this market, "invoke" means that the President formally announces the use of the Insurrection Act as legal authority for deploying active-duty U.S. military forces or federalizing the National Guard in response to civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间: Jul 31, 2026, 5:45 PM ET
For the purposes of this market, "invoke" means that the President formally announces the use of the Insurrection Act as legal authority for deploying active-duty U.S. military forces or federalizing the National Guard in response to civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
President Trump has repeatedly discussed invoking the Insurrection Act to support immigration enforcement and respond to related protests, including threats tied to ICE operations and unrest in Minnesota earlier in 2026, yet Defense and Homeland Security officials recommended against it citing reduced border crossings. Courts have limited alternative deployment authorities in cases like Trump v. Illinois, heightening focus on the Act's broad presidential discretion while underscoring historical restraint and narrow application precedents. With November midterms approaching, trader consensus reflects low near-term odds due to institutional caution, though escalation from protests, election disputes, or policy shifts could alter probabilities before year-end resolution.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议,也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于



警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题