Trader consensus strongly favors no Iranian sabotage of undersea internet cables by April 30, with 92.5% implied probability on "No," reflecting the absence of credible intelligence, official Tehran statements, or attributed incidents supporting such action. Amid ongoing Middle East tensions, including Iran's backing of Houthi Red Sea disruptions and direct exchanges with Israel, no verified cable threats or capabilities have emerged from Iranian state actors. Recent Baltic Sea cable cuts implicated Russia-linked vessels, underscoring global vulnerabilities but no Iranian role. Traders assess Tehran's asymmetric focus on drones, missiles, and proxies as mismatched for deniable undersea operations, with low precedent and high detection risks maintaining this low-probability pricing absent fresh developments.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于是
$11,910 交易量
$11,910 交易量
是
$11,910 交易量
$11,910 交易量
Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间: Mar 23, 2026, 6:23 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Only actions that cause physical damage to the undersea internet cable infrastructure, e.g., physical sabotage, such as cutting, dragging, or explosive attacks, will be considered. Cyber attacks will not qualify, even if they have kinetic effects.
Qualifying incidents must occur in the region spanning the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea, including areas surrounding the Arabian Peninsula.
Attempted attacks that do not result in damage, or actions that are intercepted or fail to impact the cables, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution.
Incidents which are broadly attributed to Iranian forces or Iranian-aligned groups will qualify regardless of the absence of definitive evidence or official Iranian denials.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Trader consensus strongly favors no Iranian sabotage of undersea internet cables by April 30, with 92.5% implied probability on "No," reflecting the absence of credible intelligence, official Tehran statements, or attributed incidents supporting such action. Amid ongoing Middle East tensions, including Iran's backing of Houthi Red Sea disruptions and direct exchanges with Israel, no verified cable threats or capabilities have emerged from Iranian state actors. Recent Baltic Sea cable cuts implicated Russia-linked vessels, underscoring global vulnerabilities but no Iranian role. Traders assess Tehran's asymmetric focus on drones, missiles, and proxies as mismatched for deniable undersea operations, with low precedent and high detection risks maintaining this low-probability pricing absent fresh developments.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题