**Israeli territorial expansion beyond the October 2025 ceasefire lines and stalled implementation of the UN Security Council-authorized International Stabilization Force (ISF) under Resolution 2803 remain the dominant factors shaping trader views on foreign intervention in Gaza.** Netanyahu’s May directive to secure up to 70 percent of the territory, coupled with ongoing IDF operations and strikes eliminating senior Hamas commanders, has kept direct foreign troop deployment off the table while highlighting the gap between the Comprehensive Plan’s second phase—Hamas disarmament, IDF withdrawal, and ISF arrival—and current realities. Hamas continues to reject full disarmament or acceptance of foreign forces, complicating Board of Peace efforts to stand up a technocratic administration and recruit contributors such as Türkiye, Indonesia, or Azerbaijan. Recent Cairo talks and incremental aid flows have not altered the deadlock, leaving any near-term multinational stabilization force contingent on breakthroughs in disarmament talks or shifts in Israeli policy before Israel’s scheduled elections.
Tóm tắt AI thử nghiệm tham chiếu dữ liệu Polymarket. Đây không phải tư vấn giao dịch và không ảnh hưởng đến cách thị trường này được giải quyết. · Cập nhật$649,253 KL.

30 tháng 6
4%
$649,253 KL.

30 tháng 6
4%
The foreign personnel must physically enter the terrestrial territory of the Gaza Strip to qualify. Entering the maritime territory, as occurred during the US’s attempt to construct a floating pier in 2024, or entering the airspace will not qualify.
Entering Israeli controlled buffer zones will not qualify.
Egyptian or other forces operating solely along the Egyptian/Gaza border will not qualify regardless of if they cross the border.
Foreign personnel carrying out individual special operations, diplomatic missions, or solely humanitarian operations will not qualify.
Qualifying deployments must involve active-duty personnel of at least one foreign state or international institution (e.g., the UN or multinational missions) who are officially sent to Gaza for an operational role (e.g., peacekeeping, convoy escort, detention, logistical support). To qualify, the deployment must occur within the specified timeframe; mere announcements will not suffice.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Thị trường mở: Feb 18, 2026, 6:39 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The foreign personnel must physically enter the terrestrial territory of the Gaza Strip to qualify. Entering the maritime territory, as occurred during the US’s attempt to construct a floating pier in 2024, or entering the airspace will not qualify.
Entering Israeli controlled buffer zones will not qualify.
Egyptian or other forces operating solely along the Egyptian/Gaza border will not qualify regardless of if they cross the border.
Foreign personnel carrying out individual special operations, diplomatic missions, or solely humanitarian operations will not qualify.
Qualifying deployments must involve active-duty personnel of at least one foreign state or international institution (e.g., the UN or multinational missions) who are officially sent to Gaza for an operational role (e.g., peacekeeping, convoy escort, detention, logistical support). To qualify, the deployment must occur within the specified timeframe; mere announcements will not suffice.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...**Israeli territorial expansion beyond the October 2025 ceasefire lines and stalled implementation of the UN Security Council-authorized International Stabilization Force (ISF) under Resolution 2803 remain the dominant factors shaping trader views on foreign intervention in Gaza.** Netanyahu’s May directive to secure up to 70 percent of the territory, coupled with ongoing IDF operations and strikes eliminating senior Hamas commanders, has kept direct foreign troop deployment off the table while highlighting the gap between the Comprehensive Plan’s second phase—Hamas disarmament, IDF withdrawal, and ISF arrival—and current realities. Hamas continues to reject full disarmament or acceptance of foreign forces, complicating Board of Peace efforts to stand up a technocratic administration and recruit contributors such as Türkiye, Indonesia, or Azerbaijan. Recent Cairo talks and incremental aid flows have not altered the deadlock, leaving any near-term multinational stabilization force contingent on breakthroughs in disarmament talks or shifts in Israeli policy before Israel’s scheduled elections.
Tóm tắt AI thử nghiệm tham chiếu dữ liệu Polymarket. Đây không phải tư vấn giao dịch và không ảnh hưởng đến cách thị trường này được giải quyết. · Cập nhật
Cẩn thận với liên kết bên ngoài.
Cẩn thận với liên kết bên ngoài.
Câu hỏi thường gặp