OpenAI’s September 8, 2026 release of both an analytical write-up and a publicly available Lean formalization for a finite-time singularity in the Navier-Stokes equations has anchored 93.5% market-implied odds against retraction. The multi-agent effort, powered by an internal model exceeding GPT-6 Astra capabilities, produced a machine-checkable proof establishing Clay statements C and D while explicitly declining the Millennium Prize. Trader consensus reflects the verifiable artifact and the fact that current disputes center on research priority and credit rather than mathematical errors. Independent verification of the GitHub repository remains the key near-term catalyst; a confirmed flaw in the formalization or an official OpenAI acknowledgment of invalidity could still shift sentiment before year-end.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於是
是
OpenAI's Navier-Stokes solution refers to the Navier-Stokes solution that OpenAI announced on September 8, 2026 (https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/).
A qualifying retraction occurs when OpenAI officially and publicly states that the published proof was incorrect or does not solve the Navier-Stokes problem. Statements by any other party will not qualify. Revisions that do not retract the correctness of the initial proof as a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem will not qualify. Statements about the authorship, credit, or attribution of the result, or about whether it qualifies for the Millennium Prize, will not on their own qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from OpenAI; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
市場開放時間: Sep 9, 2026, 6:04 PM ET
OpenAI's Navier-Stokes solution refers to the Navier-Stokes solution that OpenAI announced on September 8, 2026 (https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/).
A qualifying retraction occurs when OpenAI officially and publicly states that the published proof was incorrect or does not solve the Navier-Stokes problem. Statements by any other party will not qualify. Revisions that do not retract the correctness of the initial proof as a solution to the Navier-Stokes problem will not qualify. Statements about the authorship, credit, or attribution of the result, or about whether it qualifies for the Millennium Prize, will not on their own qualify.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from OpenAI; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
OpenAI’s September 8, 2026 release of both an analytical write-up and a publicly available Lean formalization for a finite-time singularity in the Navier-Stokes equations has anchored 93.5% market-implied odds against retraction. The multi-agent effort, powered by an internal model exceeding GPT-6 Astra capabilities, produced a machine-checkable proof establishing Clay statements C and D while explicitly declining the Millennium Prize. Trader consensus reflects the verifiable artifact and the fact that current disputes center on research priority and credit rather than mathematical errors. Independent verification of the GitHub repository remains the key near-term catalyst; a confirmed flaw in the formalization or an official OpenAI acknowledgment of invalidity could still shift sentiment before year-end.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於



警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions