Traders assign a 97.2% probability to “No” on a U.S. invasion of Greenland in 2026 because President Trump explicitly ruled out the use of military force in January 2026 after earlier tariff threats and contingency discussions, shifting instead to negotiations under the 1951 U.S.-Denmark defense agreement. Denmark, Greenlandic leaders, and NATO allies have rejected any sovereignty change, deploying limited European forces to the territory and emphasizing Greenland’s right to self-determination. Bipartisan congressional opposition and the economic risks of fracturing NATO have further constrained options. Ongoing trilateral talks focus on expanded U.S. military access and security cooperation rather than annexation. Late-year developments that could still alter the outcome include a breakdown in negotiations coinciding with new Arctic security crises or an unforeseen policy reversal, though no such indicators have emerged through early August.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於是
$1,419,886 交易量
$1,419,886 交易量
是
$1,419,886 交易量
$1,419,886 交易量
For the purposes of this market, the land territory of Greenland refers to all territory recognized by Denmark as part of the autonomous territory of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, as of market creation.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: Jan 5, 2026, 2:12 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, the land territory of Greenland refers to all territory recognized by Denmark as part of the autonomous territory of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, as of market creation.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Traders assign a 97.2% probability to “No” on a U.S. invasion of Greenland in 2026 because President Trump explicitly ruled out the use of military force in January 2026 after earlier tariff threats and contingency discussions, shifting instead to negotiations under the 1951 U.S.-Denmark defense agreement. Denmark, Greenlandic leaders, and NATO allies have rejected any sovereignty change, deploying limited European forces to the territory and emphasizing Greenland’s right to self-determination. Bipartisan congressional opposition and the economic risks of fracturing NATO have further constrained options. Ongoing trilateral talks focus on expanded U.S. military access and security cooperation rather than annexation. Late-year developments that could still alter the outcome include a breakdown in negotiations coinciding with new Arctic security crises or an unforeseen policy reversal, though no such indicators have emerged through early August.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於



警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions