Traders assign a 97.2% probability against a U.S. invasion of Greenland in 2026 because President Trump explicitly ruled out military force in January statements at Davos and subsequent remarks, shifting emphasis to negotiations over expanded U.S. military facilities through agreement with Denmark. Strong bipartisan congressional opposition, including Senate resolutions requiring approval for any action, combined with NATO allies' warnings that force against Denmark would fracture the alliance and trigger Article 5 complications, reinforced this restraint. European troop deployments to Greenland and Danish contingency planning further highlighted the prohibitive diplomatic and strategic costs. With roughly five months remaining in the year and no verified military preparations or escalatory signals, the consensus reflects the absence of viable pathways under current conditions, though abrupt policy reversals or unforeseen crises could theoretically alter the trajectory before December 31.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於是
$1,420,039 交易量
$1,420,039 交易量
是
$1,420,039 交易量
$1,420,039 交易量
For the purposes of this market, the land territory of Greenland refers to all territory recognized by Denmark as part of the autonomous territory of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, as of market creation.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
市場開放時間: Jan 5, 2026, 2:12 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...For the purposes of this market, the land territory of Greenland refers to all territory recognized by Denmark as part of the autonomous territory of Greenland within the Kingdom of Denmark, as of market creation.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Traders assign a 97.2% probability against a U.S. invasion of Greenland in 2026 because President Trump explicitly ruled out military force in January statements at Davos and subsequent remarks, shifting emphasis to negotiations over expanded U.S. military facilities through agreement with Denmark. Strong bipartisan congressional opposition, including Senate resolutions requiring approval for any action, combined with NATO allies' warnings that force against Denmark would fracture the alliance and trigger Article 5 complications, reinforced this restraint. European troop deployments to Greenland and Danish contingency planning further highlighted the prohibitive diplomatic and strategic costs. With roughly five months remaining in the year and no verified military preparations or escalatory signals, the consensus reflects the absence of viable pathways under current conditions, though abrupt policy reversals or unforeseen crises could theoretically alter the trajectory before December 31.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於



警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions