NATO's collective defense framework under Article 5, combined with established diplomatic channels and shared external security priorities, underpins the 95.8% trader consensus against any military clash among members before 2027. Recent alliance strains, including U.S. reviews of European force posture, disagreements over operations related to Iran, and disputes such as those involving Greenland, have prompted public criticism but produced no armed incidents, with bilateral issues like Turkey-Greece managed through existing mechanisms. External pressures from Russian hybrid activities have instead reinforced coordination among allies. Realistic scenarios that could still shift odds include rapid escalation in longstanding territorial frictions or spillover from U.S. policy decisions that directly pit members' forces against one another before year-end.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日はい
4% 確率
$57,942 Vol.
$57,942 Vol.
2026/12/31
はい
4% 確率
$57,942 Vol.
$57,942 Vol.
2026/12/31
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of at least two NATO member states between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force, such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between the military forces of at least two NATO member states. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: For the purposes of this market, coast guard services or equivalent forces will be considered part of a country’s military only if they are officially designated as military forces under that country’s law or command structure; purely civilian or law-enforcement maritime agencies will not be considered military forces.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.NATO's collective defense framework under Article 5, combined with established diplomatic channels and shared external security priorities, underpins the 95.8% trader consensus against any military clash among members before 2027. Recent alliance strains, including U.S. reviews of European force posture, disagreements over operations related to Iran, and disputes such as those involving Greenland, have prompted public criticism but produced no armed incidents, with bilateral issues like Turkey-Greece managed through existing mechanisms. External pressures from Russian hybrid activities have instead reinforced coordination among allies. Realistic scenarios that could still shift odds include rapid escalation in longstanding territorial frictions or spillover from U.S. policy decisions that directly pit members' forces against one another before year-end.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of at least two NATO member states between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force, such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between the military forces of at least two NATO member states. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: For the purposes of this market, coast guard services or equivalent forces will be considered part of a country’s military only if they are officially designated as military forces under that country’s law or command structure; purely civilian or law-enforcement maritime agencies will not be considered military forces.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force, such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between the military forces of at least two NATO member states. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: For the purposes of this market, coast guard services or equivalent forces will be considered part of a country’s military only if they are officially designated as military forces under that country’s law or command structure; purely civilian or law-enforcement maritime agencies will not be considered military forces.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Jan 23, 2026, 12:49 PM ET
音量
$57,942終了日
2027/01/01マーケット開始日
Jan 23, 2026, 12:49 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of at least two NATO member states between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force, such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between the military forces of at least two NATO member states. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: For the purposes of this market, coast guard services or equivalent forces will be considered part of a country’s military only if they are officially designated as military forces under that country’s law or command structure; purely civilian or law-enforcement maritime agencies will not be considered military forces.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.NATO's collective defense framework under Article 5, combined with established diplomatic channels and shared external security priorities, underpins the 95.8% trader consensus against any military clash among members before 2027. Recent alliance strains, including U.S. reviews of European force posture, disagreements over operations related to Iran, and disputes such as those involving Greenland, have prompted public criticism but produced no armed incidents, with bilateral issues like Turkey-Greece managed through existing mechanisms. External pressures from Russian hybrid activities have instead reinforced coordination among allies. Realistic scenarios that could still shift odds include rapid escalation in longstanding territorial frictions or spillover from U.S. policy decisions that directly pit members' forces against one another before year-end.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a military encounter between the military forces of at least two NATO member states between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force, such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between the military forces of at least two NATO member states. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: For the purposes of this market, coast guard services or equivalent forces will be considered part of a country’s military only if they are officially designated as military forces under that country’s law or command structure; purely civilian or law-enforcement maritime agencies will not be considered military forces.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
A "military encounter" is defined as any incident involving the use of force, such as missile strikes, artillery fire, exchange of gunfire, or other forms of direct military engagement between the military forces of at least two NATO member states. Non-violent actions, such as warning shots, artillery fire into uninhabited areas, or missile launches that land in territorial waters or pass through airspace, will not qualify for a "Yes" resolution. Intentional ship ramming that results in significant damage to (e.g., a hole in the hull) or the sinking of a military ship by another will count toward a "Yes" resolution, however minor damage (scrapes, dents) will not.
Note: For the purposes of this market, coast guard services or equivalent forces will be considered part of a country’s military only if they are officially designated as military forces under that country’s law or command structure; purely civilian or law-enforcement maritime agencies will not be considered military forces.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$57,942終了日
2027/01/01マーケット開始日
Jan 23, 2026, 12:49 PM ETリゾルバー
0x65070BE91...NATO's collective defense framework under Article 5, combined with established diplomatic channels and shared external security priorities, underpins the 95.8% trader consensus against any military clash among members before 2027. Recent alliance strains, including U.S. reviews of European force posture, disagreements over operations related to Iran, and disputes such as those involving Greenland, have prompted public criticism but produced no armed incidents, with bilateral issues like Turkey-Greece managed through existing mechanisms. External pressures from Russian hybrid activities have instead reinforced coordination among allies. Realistic scenarios that could still shift odds include rapid escalation in longstanding territorial frictions or spillover from U.S. policy decisions that directly pit members' forces against one another before year-end.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問