Michigan voters will decide the automatic constitutional convention question on the November 2026 ballot, which asks whether to convene delegates in 2027 for a general revision of the 1963 state constitution. Trader consensus favoring rejection at 96% reflects the measure’s consistent historical outcomes, including a 67% “no” vote in 2010, combined with organized opposition from a broad bipartisan coalition that includes labor groups, business organizations, and voting-rights advocates who emphasize risks of opening the entire document to changes. Limited support from some Republican legislators seeking to revisit recent voter-approved provisions has not generated widespread momentum. Past patterns show voters prefer targeted amendments over full conventions, and no major developments since the question’s automatic placement have altered this dynamic. Late-breaking events such as unexpected endorsements, polling shifts, or turnout anomalies remain possible but would need to overcome entrenched precedent and active campaign efforts against the proposal.