Moonshot’s Kimi K3 open-weight model recently surged to the top of Arena.ai’s Code Arena WebDev leaderboard with a 1679 Elo score in blind frontend coding and agentic build evaluations, outpacing Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. This late-July breakthrough tightened the race for second place among labs whose latest releases sit within a narrow Elo band on multi-step web tasks. Traders assign Moonshot roughly 46% odds of finishing second by month-end, followed by Alibaba’s Qwen series at 25% and Anthropic at 14%, reflecting ongoing Chinese lab momentum in large-scale MoE architectures versus incremental U.S. updates. Key swing factors include any new model drops or leaderboard volatility before the August 31 snapshot, as small capability edges in React scaffolding, debugging, and tool-use workflows can reorder lab rankings quickly.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Moonshot 49.1%
阿里巴巴 22.3%
Anthropic 14%
OpenAI 8.8%
$57,563 交易量
$57,563 交易量

Moonshot
49%

阿里巴巴
22%

Anthropic
14%

OpenAI
9%

1%

DeepSeek
<1%

騰訊
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

Meta
<1%

字節跳動
<1%

MiniMax
<1%

小米
<1%

Thinky
<1%
Moonshot 49.1%
阿里巴巴 22.3%
Anthropic 14%
OpenAI 8.8%
$57,563 交易量
$57,563 交易量

Moonshot
49%

阿里巴巴
22%

Anthropic
14%

OpenAI
9%

1%

DeepSeek
<1%

騰訊
<1%

Poolside
<1%

Mistral
<1%

Z.ai
<1%

SpaceXAI
<1%

Meta
<1%

字節跳動
<1%

MiniMax
<1%

小米
<1%

Thinky
<1%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Jul 20, 2026, 8:25 PM ET
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Moonshot’s Kimi K3 open-weight model recently surged to the top of Arena.ai’s Code Arena WebDev leaderboard with a 1679 Elo score in blind frontend coding and agentic build evaluations, outpacing Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. This late-July breakthrough tightened the race for second place among labs whose latest releases sit within a narrow Elo band on multi-step web tasks. Traders assign Moonshot roughly 46% odds of finishing second by month-end, followed by Alibaba’s Qwen series at 25% and Anthropic at 14%, reflecting ongoing Chinese lab momentum in large-scale MoE architectures versus incremental U.S. updates. Key swing factors include any new model drops or leaderboard volatility before the August 31 snapshot, as small capability edges in React scaffolding, debugging, and tool-use workflows can reorder lab rankings quickly.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions