Tight Polymarket odds for dissents at the December 17-18 FOMC meeting—1 (43%), 2 (43%), and 3 (43%) leading—mirror trader consensus on modest hawkish pushback against the anticipated 25-basis-point rate cut, following November's unanimous easing. The September dot plot's shift to just two 2025 cuts, versus prior four, amplified divergence, with hawks like Governors Bowman and Jefferson signaling pause preferences in recent speeches. Historical precedent shows rare multi-dissents (maximum two since 2006), capping 4+ at 40.5% and 0 at 38.5%, but rotating regional voters introduce volatility. Key differentiator: strength of incoming data; softer inflation bolsters consensus cut odds, while upside surprises could spur 2-3 dissents.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket · Actualizado1 43%
2 43%
3 43%
4+ 41%
0
38%
1
43%
2
43%
3
43%
4+
41%
1 43%
2 43%
3 43%
4+ 41%
0
38%
1
43%
2
43%
3
43%
4+
41%
This market will resolve according to the number of dissenting votes recorded at the next Federal Reserve Open Market Committee monetary policy meeting, specifically those dissenting on the Fed Funds Rate decision.
The resolution source for this market is the FOMC’s statement after its meeting scheduled for April 28-29, 2026, according to the official calendar: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm.
This market may resolve as soon as the FOMC’s statement for their April meeting with relevant data is issued; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
Mercado abierto: Mar 19, 2026, 8:12 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Tight Polymarket odds for dissents at the December 17-18 FOMC meeting—1 (43%), 2 (43%), and 3 (43%) leading—mirror trader consensus on modest hawkish pushback against the anticipated 25-basis-point rate cut, following November's unanimous easing. The September dot plot's shift to just two 2025 cuts, versus prior four, amplified divergence, with hawks like Governors Bowman and Jefferson signaling pause preferences in recent speeches. Historical precedent shows rare multi-dissents (maximum two since 2006), capping 4+ at 40.5% and 0 at 38.5%, but rotating regional voters introduce volatility. Key differentiator: strength of incoming data; softer inflation bolsters consensus cut odds, while upside surprises could spur 2-3 dissents.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes