President Trump's recent Truth Social posts have driven trader sentiment, with a barrage of personal insults targeting former MAGA allies like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Alex Jones over their criticism of his Iran war escalation—labeling them "losers," "low IQ," and "stupid people" as recently as yesterday. This continues a pattern amid the ongoing conflict, including White House mockery of George Clooney's acting as a "war crime" two days ago and attacks on Bruce Springsteen eight days prior. No recent days without such rhetoric, reflecting his frequent posting habits. Upcoming NATO discussions and potential press briefings could prompt further public statements, though resolution hinges on verifiable public insults by the market's daily cutoff.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日新規
2026/04/11
April 11
57%
April 12
58%
April 13
55%
April 14
55%
April 15
59%
April 16
59%
April 17
61%
April 18
61%
April 19
60%
April 20
62%
April 21
60%
April 22
61%
April 23
60%
April 24
46%
April 25
60%
April 26
60%
April 27
60%
April 28
60%
April 29
60%
April 30
61%
$5,241 Vol.
April 11
$152 Vol.
57%
April 12
$24 Vol.
58%
April 13
$36 Vol.
55%
April 14
$49 Vol.
55%
April 15
$1,569 Vol.
59%
April 16
$34 Vol.
59%
April 17
$23 Vol.
61%
April 18
$0 Vol.
61%
April 19
$0 Vol.
60%
April 20
$465 Vol.
62%
April 21
$0 Vol.
60%
April 22
$0 Vol.
61%
April 23
$176 Vol.
60%
April 24
$2,712 Vol.
46%
April 25
$2 Vol.
60%
April 26
$0 Vol.
60%
April 27
$0 Vol.
60%
April 28
$0 Vol.
60%
April 29
$0 Vol.
60%
April 30
$0 Vol.
61%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's recent Truth Social posts have driven trader sentiment, with a barrage of personal insults targeting former MAGA allies like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Alex Jones over their criticism of his Iran war escalation—labeling them "losers," "low IQ," and "stupid people" as recently as yesterday. This continues a pattern amid the ongoing conflict, including White House mockery of George Clooney's acting as a "war crime" two days ago and attacks on Bruce Springsteen eight days prior. No recent days without such rhetoric, reflecting his frequent posting habits. Upcoming NATO discussions and potential press briefings could prompt further public statements, though resolution hinges on verifiable public insults by the market's daily cutoff.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
マーケット開始日： Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ET
音量
$5,241終了日
2026/04/30マーケット開始日
Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's recent Truth Social posts have driven trader sentiment, with a barrage of personal insults targeting former MAGA allies like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Alex Jones over their criticism of his Iran war escalation—labeling them "losers," "low IQ," and "stupid people" as recently as yesterday. This continues a pattern amid the ongoing conflict, including White House mockery of George Clooney's acting as a "war crime" two days ago and attacks on Bruce Springsteen eight days prior. No recent days without such rhetoric, reflecting his frequent posting habits. Upcoming NATO discussions and potential press briefings could prompt further public statements, though resolution hinges on verifiable public insults by the market's daily cutoff.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
音量
$5,241終了日
2026/04/30マーケット開始日
Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump's recent Truth Social posts have driven trader sentiment, with a barrage of personal insults targeting former MAGA allies like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, and Alex Jones over their criticism of his Iran war escalation—labeling them "losers," "low IQ," and "stupid people" as recently as yesterday. This continues a pattern amid the ongoing conflict, including White House mockery of George Clooney's acting as a "war crime" two days ago and attacks on Bruce Springsteen eight days prior. No recent days without such rhetoric, reflecting his frequent posting habits. Upcoming NATO discussions and potential press briefings could prompt further public statements, though resolution hinges on verifiable public insults by the market's daily cutoff.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日
外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問