President Trump's escalating public feud with Pope Leo XIV, triggered by the pontiff's criticism of U.S. military actions in Iran, has dominated his recent social media rhetoric, with attacks labeling the pope "too liberal" and "weak on crime" as recently as April 13-15. This follows April 9 insults toward Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly for opposing escalation in Iran, underscoring trader focus on Trump's pattern of targeting policy critics amid ongoing conflict developments. Backlash from Catholic voters risks midterm fallout, potentially amplifying further barbs before the April 30 deadline, while diplomatic updates or media clashes could shift targets in this closely watched rhetorical market.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado$62,050 Vol.
30 abr 2026
Keir Starmer
63%
Barack Obama
67%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
49%
Papa Leão XIV
28%
Tucker Carlson
30%
Megyn Kelly
29%
Alex Jones
14%
Pam Bondi
8%
Benjamin Netanyahu
5%
Elon Musk
3%
Viktor Orbán
2%
Vladimir Putin
2%
J.D. Vance
2%
Xi Jinping
2%
Melania Trump
1%
Candace Owens
43%
$62,050 Vol.
Keir Starmer
$40 Vol.
63%
Barack Obama
$1,683 Vol.
67%
Marjorie Taylor Greene
$167 Vol.
49%
Papa Leão XIV
$1,711 Vol.
28%
Tucker Carlson
$763 Vol.
30%
Megyn Kelly
$0 Vol.
29%
Alex Jones
$1,314 Vol.
14%
Pam Bondi
$451 Vol.
8%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$6,047 Vol.
5%
Elon Musk
$842 Vol.
3%
Viktor Orbán
$3,319 Vol.
2%
Vladimir Putin
$1,464 Vol.
2%
J.D. Vance
$5,284 Vol.
2%
Xi Jinping
$6,195 Vol.
2%
Melania Trump
$5,306 Vol.
1%
Candace Owens
$47 Vol.
43%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's escalating public feud with Pope Leo XIV, triggered by the pontiff's criticism of U.S. military actions in Iran, has dominated his recent social media rhetoric, with attacks labeling the pope "too liberal" and "weak on crime" as recently as April 13-15. This follows April 9 insults toward Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly for opposing escalation in Iran, underscoring trader focus on Trump's pattern of targeting policy critics amid ongoing conflict developments. Backlash from Catholic voters risks midterm fallout, potentially amplifying further barbs before the April 30 deadline, while diplomatic updates or media clashes could shift targets in this closely watched rhetorical market.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado Aberto: Apr 13, 2026, 6:36 PM ET
Volume
$62,050Data de Término
30 abr 2026Mercado Aberto
Apr 13, 2026, 6:36 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Resultado proposto: Sim
Sem contestação
Resultado final: Sim
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's escalating public feud with Pope Leo XIV, triggered by the pontiff's criticism of U.S. military actions in Iran, has dominated his recent social media rhetoric, with attacks labeling the pope "too liberal" and "weak on crime" as recently as April 13-15. This follows April 9 insults toward Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly for opposing escalation in Iran, underscoring trader focus on Trump's pattern of targeting policy critics amid ongoing conflict developments. Backlash from Catholic voters risks midterm fallout, potentially amplifying further barbs before the April 30 deadline, while diplomatic updates or media clashes could shift targets in this closely watched rhetorical market.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks the listed individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$62,050Data de Término
30 abr 2026Mercado Aberto
Apr 13, 2026, 6:36 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Resultado proposto: Sim
Sem contestação
Resultado final: Sim
President Trump's escalating public feud with Pope Leo XIV, triggered by the pontiff's criticism of U.S. military actions in Iran, has dominated his recent social media rhetoric, with attacks labeling the pope "too liberal" and "weak on crime" as recently as April 13-15. This follows April 9 insults toward Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly for opposing escalation in Iran, underscoring trader focus on Trump's pattern of targeting policy critics amid ongoing conflict developments. Backlash from Catholic voters risks midterm fallout, potentially amplifying further barbs before the April 30 deadline, while diplomatic updates or media clashes could shift targets in this closely watched rhetorical market.
Resumo experimental gerado por IA com dados do Polymarket. Isto não é aconselhamento de trading e não tem qualquer papel na resolução deste mercado. · Atualizado
Cuidado com os links externos.
Cuidado com os links externos.
Frequently Asked Questions