Trader sentiment on Polymarket reflects tight competition between one (43%) and two (43%) dissents at the July 30-31 FOMC meeting, driven primarily by June meeting minutes revealing internal divisions—some officials pushed for earlier rate-cut signals amid cooling inflation, while others urged patience. Recent softer June CPI data (headline 3% YoY) has boosted market-implied odds for a September 25bps cut to near 95% on fed funds futures, pressuring dovish members like Goolsbee or Daly to dissent against holding rates steady, countered by hawks like Logan. Zero dissents (27%) lags as traders price modest discord versus historical unanimity, with the dot plot update as the key differentiator; a downward shift in median cuts could tip toward two dissents if paired with hawkish holdouts.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于1 43%
2 43%
3 33%
0 27%
0
27%
1
43%
2
43%
3
33%
4+
26%
1 43%
2 43%
3 33%
0 27%
0
27%
1
43%
2
43%
3
33%
4+
26%
This market will resolve according to the number of dissenting votes recorded at the next Federal Reserve Open Market Committee monetary policy meeting, specifically those dissenting on the Fed Funds Rate decision.
The resolution source for this market is the FOMC’s statement after its meeting scheduled for April 28-29, 2026, according to the official calendar: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm.
This market may resolve as soon as the FOMC’s statement for their April meeting with relevant data is issued; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.
市场开放时间: Mar 19, 2026, 8:12 PM ET
Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Resolver
0x69c47De9D...Trader sentiment on Polymarket reflects tight competition between one (43%) and two (43%) dissents at the July 30-31 FOMC meeting, driven primarily by June meeting minutes revealing internal divisions—some officials pushed for earlier rate-cut signals amid cooling inflation, while others urged patience. Recent softer June CPI data (headline 3% YoY) has boosted market-implied odds for a September 25bps cut to near 95% on fed funds futures, pressuring dovish members like Goolsbee or Daly to dissent against holding rates steady, countered by hawks like Logan. Zero dissents (27%) lags as traders price modest discord versus historical unanimity, with the dot plot update as the key differentiator; a downward shift in median cuts could tip toward two dissents if paired with hawkish holdouts.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题