Recent court rulings have repeatedly blocked Trump administration executive orders and DOJ actions seeking greater federal oversight of voter rolls, mail voting, and election procedures ahead of the 2026 midterms, citing the Constitution's assignment of primary authority over election timing, places, and manner to the states. Multiple federal judges have struck down or limited these measures, including a March 2026 order, emphasizing that no emergency powers grant the president unilateral control. Trump has publicly discussed "nationalizing" voting and left open the possibility of national security declarations, yet legal analyses and ongoing state resistance underscore structural barriers. These developments, combined with Congress's historical role in setting limited federal election rules, underpin traders' strong consensus against full nationalization occurring.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于是
7% 概率
$19,804 交易量
$19,804 交易量
2026-12-30
是
7% 概率
$19,804 交易量
$19,804 交易量
2026-12-30
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Recent court rulings have repeatedly blocked Trump administration executive orders and DOJ actions seeking greater federal oversight of voter rolls, mail voting, and election procedures ahead of the 2026 midterms, citing the Constitution's assignment of primary authority over election timing, places, and manner to the states. Multiple federal judges have struck down or limited these measures, including a March 2026 order, emphasizing that no emergency powers grant the president unilateral control. Trump has publicly discussed "nationalizing" voting and left open the possibility of national security declarations, yet legal analyses and ongoing state resistance underscore structural barriers. These developments, combined with Congress's historical role in setting limited federal election rules, underpin traders' strong consensus against full nationalization occurring.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
市场开放时间： Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ET
交易量
$19,804结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
Recent court rulings have repeatedly blocked Trump administration executive orders and DOJ actions seeking greater federal oversight of voter rolls, mail voting, and election procedures ahead of the 2026 midterms, citing the Constitution's assignment of primary authority over election timing, places, and manner to the states. Multiple federal judges have struck down or limited these measures, including a March 2026 order, emphasizing that no emergency powers grant the president unilateral control. Trump has publicly discussed "nationalizing" voting and left open the possibility of national security declarations, yet legal analyses and ongoing state resistance underscore structural barriers. These developments, combined with Congress's historical role in setting limited federal election rules, underpin traders' strong consensus against full nationalization occurring.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Donald Trump signs any federal legislation into law or performs any executive action that creates new legal authority for the federal government to exercise direct administrative control over the previously-localized administration of federal elections by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
A qualifying legislation or action must seek to grant continuing federal control over previously-localized (State-level or local-level) vote-counting, vote certification, or actual election-day voting in federal elections for jurisdictions in more than one state. Temporary federal support to local election authorities, or the execution of previously-recognized federal election duties, will not count.
The primary resolution source will be official information from the United States federal government and a consensus of credible reporting.
交易量
$19,804结束日期
2026-12-31市场开放时间
Feb 4, 2026, 5:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Recent court rulings have repeatedly blocked Trump administration executive orders and DOJ actions seeking greater federal oversight of voter rolls, mail voting, and election procedures ahead of the 2026 midterms, citing the Constitution's assignment of primary authority over election timing, places, and manner to the states. Multiple federal judges have struck down or limited these measures, including a March 2026 order, emphasizing that no emergency powers grant the president unilateral control. Trump has publicly discussed "nationalizing" voting and left open the possibility of national security declarations, yet legal analyses and ongoing state resistance underscore structural barriers. These developments, combined with Congress's historical role in setting limited federal election rules, underpin traders' strong consensus against full nationalization occurring.
基于Polymarket数据的AI实验性摘要。这不是交易建议，也不影响该市场的结算方式。 · 更新于
警惕外部链接哦。
警惕外部链接哦。
常见问题