President Trump's frequent Truth Social posts featuring personal insults toward critics have shaped trader consensus in this market, reflecting his consistent rhetorical style amid foreign policy tensions. In the past week, he attacked Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly on April 9 over their Iran coverage, using starkly personal terms, while his recent disparagement of Pope Leo XIV drew widespread backlash from Catholic groups as of April 15. An expletive-laden April 6 message highlighted frustrations with Iran, showing no recent pause in such language. Ongoing Iran developments, media interviews like the April 15 Fox Business appearance, and potential escalations could prompt further public statements on the resolution date.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado$137,342 Vol.
15 abr 2026
16 de abril
91%
17 de abril
91%
18 de abril
83%
19 de abril
81%
20 de abril
73%
21 de abril
82%
22 de abril
84%
23 de abril
86%
24 de abril
81%
25 de abril
84%
26 de abril
76%
27 de abril
79%
28 de abril
76%
29 de abril
80%
30 de abril
82%
$137,342 Vol.
16 de abril
$4,869 Vol.
91%
17 de abril
$8,360 Vol.
91%
18 de abril
$4,837 Vol.
83%
19 de abril
$434 Vol.
81%
20 de abril
$957 Vol.
73%
21 de abril
$6,070 Vol.
82%
22 de abril
$3,113 Vol.
84%
23 de abril
$7,676 Vol.
86%
24 de abril
$5,872 Vol.
81%
25 de abril
$4,898 Vol.
84%
26 de abril
$2,220 Vol.
76%
27 de abril
$5,907 Vol.
79%
28 de abril
$394 Vol.
76%
29 de abril
$3,608 Vol.
80%
30 de abril
$441 Vol.
82%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's frequent Truth Social posts featuring personal insults toward critics have shaped trader consensus in this market, reflecting his consistent rhetorical style amid foreign policy tensions. In the past week, he attacked Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly on April 9 over their Iran coverage, using starkly personal terms, while his recent disparagement of Pope Leo XIV drew widespread backlash from Catholic groups as of April 15. An expletive-laden April 6 message highlighted frustrations with Iran, showing no recent pause in such language. Ongoing Iran developments, media interviews like the April 15 Fox Business appearance, and potential escalations could prompt further public statements on the resolution date.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Mercado abierto: Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ET
Volumen
$137,342Fecha de finalización
30 abr 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Resultado propuesto: Sí
Sin disputa
Resultado final: Sí
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.President Trump's frequent Truth Social posts featuring personal insults toward critics have shaped trader consensus in this market, reflecting his consistent rhetorical style amid foreign policy tensions. In the past week, he attacked Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly on April 9 over their Iran coverage, using starkly personal terms, while his recent disparagement of Pope Leo XIV drew widespread backlash from Catholic groups as of April 15. An expletive-laden April 6 message highlighted frustrations with Iran, showing no recent pause in such language. Ongoing Iran developments, media interviews like the April 15 Fox Business appearance, and potential escalations could prompt further public statements on the resolution date.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count.
A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Volumen
$137,342Fecha de finalización
30 abr 2026Mercado abierto
Apr 10, 2026, 4:58 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Resultado propuesto: Sí
Sin disputa
Resultado final: Sí
President Trump's frequent Truth Social posts featuring personal insults toward critics have shaped trader consensus in this market, reflecting his consistent rhetorical style amid foreign policy tensions. In the past week, he attacked Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly on April 9 over their Iran coverage, using starkly personal terms, while his recent disparagement of Pope Leo XIV drew widespread backlash from Catholic groups as of April 15. An expletive-laden April 6 message highlighted frustrations with Iran, showing no recent pause in such language. Ongoing Iran developments, media interviews like the April 15 Fox Business appearance, and potential escalations could prompt further public statements on the resolution date.
Resumen experimental generado por IA con datos de Polymarket. Esto no es asesoramiento de trading y no influye en cómo se resuelve este mercado. · Actualizado
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Cuidado con los enlaces externos.
Preguntas frecuentes