OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed the top spot on Code Arena’s WebDev leaderboard with a 35-point Elo lead, shifting trader focus to the tightly contested second-place race. Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 variants, Moonshot’s Kimi K3, and Z.ai’s GLM models remain the strongest challengers based on recent human preference votes across frontend agentic tasks like multi-file React builds and tool-use workflows. The narrow gaps reflect rapid iteration by multiple labs, with open-weight releases and cost-efficient options compressing historical performance differences. Continued vote accumulation, category-specific leaderboards, and any new model drops before November could reorder standings quickly, underscoring the market’s sensitivity to fresh benchmark data.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於Moonshot 23%
Z.ai 23%
SpaceXAI 22%
MiniMax 22%

Moonshot
23%

Z.ai
23%

SpaceXAI
22%

MiniMax
22%

阿里巴巴
20%

Mistral
20%

Anthropic
20%

Meta
16%

ByteDance
15%

Poolside
14%

Thinky
14%

14%

小米
14%

OpenAI
13%

騰訊
8%

DeepSeek
7%
Moonshot 23%
Z.ai 23%
SpaceXAI 22%
MiniMax 22%

Moonshot
23%

Z.ai
23%

SpaceXAI
22%

MiniMax
22%

阿里巴巴
20%

Mistral
20%

Anthropic
20%

Meta
16%

ByteDance
15%

Poolside
14%

Thinky
14%

14%

小米
14%

OpenAI
13%

騰訊
8%

DeepSeek
7%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Sep 17, 2026, 8:13 PM ET
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies second place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra recently claimed the top spot on Code Arena’s WebDev leaderboard with a 35-point Elo lead, shifting trader focus to the tightly contested second-place race. Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 and Opus 5 variants, Moonshot’s Kimi K3, and Z.ai’s GLM models remain the strongest challengers based on recent human preference votes across frontend agentic tasks like multi-file React builds and tool-use workflows. The narrow gaps reflect rapid iteration by multiple labs, with open-weight releases and cost-efficient options compressing historical performance differences. Continued vote accumulation, category-specific leaderboards, and any new model drops before November could reorder standings quickly, underscoring the market’s sensitivity to fresh benchmark data.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions