Recent OpenAI and Anthropic model launches have reshaped Code Arena WebDev rankings, with GPT-6 Astra claiming the top spot in early September and Claude variants holding second and third, leaving the third-best lab position fluid through November. Trader consensus reflects this uncertainty, as Moonshot’s Kimi K3, DeepSeek’s efficient MoE releases, Meta, MiniMax, Mistral, and Alibaba continue iterating on agentic coding, long-context handling, and cost-performance for frontend and full-stack tasks. Key swing factors include upcoming model updates, community vote momentum on multi-step web dev workflows, and whether open-weight or lower-cost labs can close gaps on proprietary frontier performance before resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於DeepSeek 38%
Thinky 37%
字節跳動 27%
Moonshot 26%

DeepSeek
38%

Thinky
37%

字節跳動
27%

Moonshot
26%

MiniMax
25%

OpenAI
24%

Meta
23%

Mistral
15%

Anthropic
14%

Z.ai
14%

SpaceXAI
14%

阿里巴巴
14%

騰訊
14%

小米
13%

Poolside
13%

11%
DeepSeek 38%
Thinky 37%
字節跳動 27%
Moonshot 26%

DeepSeek
38%

Thinky
37%

字節跳動
27%

Moonshot
26%

MiniMax
25%

OpenAI
24%

Meta
23%

Mistral
15%

Anthropic
14%

Z.ai
14%

SpaceXAI
14%

阿里巴巴
14%

騰訊
14%

小米
13%

Poolside
13%

11%
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
市場開放時間: Sep 17, 2026, 8:08 PM ET
Results from the "Lab Rank" column under the "Code Arena | WebDev" Leaderboard tab at https://arena.ai/leaderboard/code/webdev?rankBy=labs (Overall) filtered for "Labs" will be used to resolve this market.
Note: Models marked “AutoEval” at the applicable check time will not be considered, regardless of whether they display a rank or score.
AI companies will be ordered primarily by their Lab Rank at the market’s check time. If the results based on the lab ranking are ambiguous or unavailable, the relevant AI companies will be ordered according to their highest-ranking AI model in the leaderboard’s “Models” view. If two or more models are tied on rank, they will be ordered by which model is listed higher on the leaderboard. If a tie still remains, alphabetical order of AI lab/company names as listed in this market group will be used as a final tiebreaker (e.g., “Google” would be ranked ahead of “SpaceXAI”). This market will resolve based on the company that occupies third place under this ranking.
The resolution source for this market is the arena.ai Code Arena | WebDev Leaderboard. If this resolution source is unavailable at check time, this market will remain open until the leaderboard comes back online and will resolve based on the first check after it becomes available. If it becomes permanently unavailable, this market will resolve to "Other".
Recent OpenAI and Anthropic model launches have reshaped Code Arena WebDev rankings, with GPT-6 Astra claiming the top spot in early September and Claude variants holding second and third, leaving the third-best lab position fluid through November. Trader consensus reflects this uncertainty, as Moonshot’s Kimi K3, DeepSeek’s efficient MoE releases, Meta, MiniMax, Mistral, and Alibaba continue iterating on agentic coding, long-context handling, and cost-performance for frontend and full-stack tasks. Key swing factors include upcoming model updates, community vote momentum on multi-step web dev workflows, and whether open-weight or lower-cost labs can close gaps on proprietary frontier performance before resolution.
基於Polymarket數據的AI實驗性摘要。這不是交易建議,也不影響該市場的結算方式。 · 更新於
警惕外部連結哦。
警惕外部連結哦。
Frequently Asked Questions