Negotiations between U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf in Islamabad stalled over the weekend, with the U.S. demanding a 20-year moratorium on Iran's uranium enrichment while Tehran countered with just five years, highlighting persistent diplomatic gaps on the nuclear stockpile. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed on April 8 that Iran indicated willingness to hand over enriched uranium, but no Iranian officials have corroborated this amid Tehran's insistence on enrichment rights under IAEA monitoring. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's rhetoric on potential U.S. seizure faces massive logistical hurdles—verification, packaging, and transport from possibly buried sites like Isfahan—within the tight May 31 deadline, echoing JCPOA precedents where Russia handled transfers to avoid direct U.S. custody. Traders' 79.5% "No" consensus reflects these unresolved sticking points, ceasefire expiry risks by April 22, and historical base rates favoring prolonged talks over swift resolution.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · AggiornatoGli Stati Uniti ottengono l'uranio arricchito iraniano entro il 31 maggio?
Gli Stati Uniti ottengono l'uranio arricchito iraniano entro il 31 maggio?
Sì
$3,585,472 Vol.
$3,585,472 Vol.
Sì
$3,585,472 Vol.
$3,585,472 Vol.
“Possession” means that the United States has actual physical custody or control of the enriched uranium, whether held within U.S. territory or elsewhere. Announcements of deals, agreements, commitments, or plans under which the United States would acquire possession of Iranian enriched uranium at a later time will not qualify.
Qualifying possession of Iranian enriched uranium may be acquired through any means, including through an agreed surrender or seizure.
A widespread consensus of credible reporting that the United States has gained possession of Iranian enriched uranium will also qualify for a “Yes” resolution, even if the United States makes no formal announcement.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of the United States; however, a widespread consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Mercato aperto: Mar 31, 2026, 5:47 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...“Possession” means that the United States has actual physical custody or control of the enriched uranium, whether held within U.S. territory or elsewhere. Announcements of deals, agreements, commitments, or plans under which the United States would acquire possession of Iranian enriched uranium at a later time will not qualify.
Qualifying possession of Iranian enriched uranium may be acquired through any means, including through an agreed surrender or seizure.
A widespread consensus of credible reporting that the United States has gained possession of Iranian enriched uranium will also qualify for a “Yes” resolution, even if the United States makes no formal announcement.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the government of the United States; however, a widespread consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Negotiations between U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf in Islamabad stalled over the weekend, with the U.S. demanding a 20-year moratorium on Iran's uranium enrichment while Tehran countered with just five years, highlighting persistent diplomatic gaps on the nuclear stockpile. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed on April 8 that Iran indicated willingness to hand over enriched uranium, but no Iranian officials have corroborated this amid Tehran's insistence on enrichment rights under IAEA monitoring. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's rhetoric on potential U.S. seizure faces massive logistical hurdles—verification, packaging, and transport from possibly buried sites like Isfahan—within the tight May 31 deadline, echoing JCPOA precedents where Russia handled transfers to avoid direct U.S. custody. Traders' 79.5% "No" consensus reflects these unresolved sticking points, ceasefire expiry risks by April 22, and historical base rates favoring prolonged talks over swift resolution.
Riepilogo sperimentale generato dall'AI con riferimento ai dati di Polymarket. Questo non è un consiglio di trading e non ha alcun ruolo nella risoluzione di questo mercato. · Aggiornato
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Fai attenzione ai link esterni.
Domande frequenti