The Trump administration has pursued substantial reductions in U.S. military commitments to NATO, including thousands of troop withdrawals from Europe, cuts to fighter jets, aerial refuelers, bombers, maritime patrol aircraft, and naval assets, alongside a strategic pivot toward the Indo-Pacific. These steps reflect long-standing pressure on allies to raise defense spending and assume greater responsibility for European security. Formal U.S. withdrawal remains unlikely in the near term, however, due to a 2023 law requiring two-thirds Senate approval or congressional action, bipartisan congressional resistance, and the alliance's one-year notice period under Article 13. European members continue preparing contingency plans while NATO leadership characterizes the changes as rebalancing rather than exit. Scheduled force posture reviews and upcoming ministerial meetings could influence further adjustments.
Polymarketデータを参照したAI生成の実験的な要約。これは取引アドバイスではなく、このマーケットの解決方法には一切関係ありません。 · 更新日US Senators urge Defense Department to reverse planned NATO force cuts
US Senators Michael Bennet, Joe Neguse, and Don Bacon sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth urging reconsideration of planned reductions in US military contributions to NATO, emphasizing the importance of the alliance and warning against creating vulnerabilities. This reflects strong congressional opposition to any US withdrawal from NATO.
No formal US notice of withdrawal from NATO issued by August 2026
December 31 dips to 2%1%
By late August 2026, despite ongoing troop withdrawals and military reductions, no official notice of denunciation under Article 13 of the NATO Treaty had been submitted by the US government. NATO and US officials continued to emphasize alliance commitments, leading to a further decline in market expectations for a US withdrawal within the year.




外部リンクに注意してください。
外部リンクに注意してください。
よくある質問