President Trump has not invoked a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act over election interference, despite a February 2026 draft executive order circulated by allies alleging foreign threats like Chinese meddling to justify federal voting oversight ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump publicly dismissed the proposal, citing instead legislative paths like voter ID laws. On March 31, he signed Executive Order 14399, directing citizenship verification and a national voter eligibility database to enhance election integrity without emergency powers. Trader consensus at 81% "No" reflects constitutional state authority over elections, likely court challenges, and the administration's pivot to targeted executive actions, with no recent escalation as midterms approach.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트예
$140,855 거래량
$140,855 거래량
2026.12.31
예
$140,855 거래량
$140,855 거래량
2026.12.31
This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.President Trump has not invoked a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act over election interference, despite a February 2026 draft executive order circulated by allies alleging foreign threats like Chinese meddling to justify federal voting oversight ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump publicly dismissed the proposal, citing instead legislative paths like voter ID laws. On March 31, he signed Executive Order 14399, directing citizenship verification and a national voter eligibility database to enhance election integrity without emergency powers. Trader consensus at 81% "No" reflects constitutional state authority over elections, likely court challenges, and the administration's pivot to targeted executive actions, with no recent escalation as midterms approach.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
마켓 개설일: Feb 26, 2026, 4:29 PM ET
거래량
$140,855종료일
2026.12.31마켓 개설일
Feb 26, 2026, 4:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.President Trump has not invoked a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act over election interference, despite a February 2026 draft executive order circulated by allies alleging foreign threats like Chinese meddling to justify federal voting oversight ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump publicly dismissed the proposal, citing instead legislative paths like voter ID laws. On March 31, he signed Executive Order 14399, directing citizenship verification and a national voter eligibility database to enhance election integrity without emergency powers. Trader consensus at 81% "No" reflects constitutional state authority over elections, likely court challenges, and the administration's pivot to targeted executive actions, with no recent escalation as midterms approach.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if President Donald Trump formally declares a national emergency, pursuant to the National Emergencies Act, explicitly relating to interference in U.S. elections or election processes, by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
A qualifying declaration must include formal language stating that a national emergency exists and must be issued under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.). The declaration must explicitly reference interference in U.S. elections, election processes, election systems, voting procedures, ballots, or voting machines as the basis for the emergency. Statements, speeches, social media posts, draft orders, executive orders that do not formally declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act, or other actions that merely reference election interference without declaring a national emergency will not qualify.
Renewals or extensions of previously existing national emergencies will not qualify unless the text is materially modified to explicitly relate to election interference.
The primary resolution source will be the Federal Register and official White House publications, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
거래량
$140,855종료일
2026.12.31마켓 개설일
Feb 26, 2026, 4:29 PM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...President Trump has not invoked a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act over election interference, despite a February 2026 draft executive order circulated by allies alleging foreign threats like Chinese meddling to justify federal voting oversight ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump publicly dismissed the proposal, citing instead legislative paths like voter ID laws. On March 31, he signed Executive Order 14399, directing citizenship verification and a national voter eligibility database to enhance election integrity without emergency powers. Trader consensus at 81% "No" reflects constitutional state authority over elections, likely court challenges, and the administration's pivot to targeted executive actions, with no recent escalation as midterms approach.
Polymarket 데이터를 참조하는 실험적 AI 생성 요약입니다. 이것은 거래 조언이 아니며 이 마켓의 정산에 영향을 미치지 않습니다. · 업데이트
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
외부 링크에 주의하세요.
자주 묻는 질문